return of the child.”

It found that the child needed the daily presence of his grandparents in his life and that it was in the best interests of the child to leave him in their care.

of the child.” 18.

    producing child pornography; b.     offering or making available child pornography; c.     distributing or transmitting child pornography; d.

The applicant had never lived with Mrs H. or the child. The child had lived with Mr and Mrs H., a married couple, since his birth.

return of the child.”

Le 25 novembre 2024, la société Chill Shack a assigné la société Locam devant le juge de l’exécution.

are entitled to a fixed monthly allowance of approximately EUR 47; the disabled child would receive twice the amount of a normal child allowance, reaching about EUR 18 a month.

Apart from this preliminary diagnosis, the applicant’s child did not have a sufficient quantity of amino liquids in the womb; therefore, she was informed that the child would most likely not survive.

until the birth of the child, or at least during a part of this period, shall be considered the father of that child. ...”

He also locked the child in a small room without lights and used to remove all the light-bulbs in the house when leaving for work, as a punishment, knowing that the child was afraid of dark.

on 23 March 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant, a Hungarian-Romanian dual national residing in Basel, Switzerland, complains about the abduction to Budapest, Hungary, of his four-month old child

The father refused systematically to hand over the child to the applicant, and refused to comply with the court order.

In his opinion such rejection was exceptional for a child of Cs.H.’s age. 24.

Choice of foster home for the individual child When choosing a foster home for a child, the child welfare service shall give decisive weight to what is in the child’s best interests, cf. section 4-1 of

as mother and to allow the person who had contributed the sperm to acknowledge paternity in respect of the child.

as mother and to allow the person who had contributed the sperm to acknowledge paternity in respect of the child.

  He again visited V. and the child two weeks later at V.'s parents' home.   21.    On 17 November 1988 V. placed the child for adoption.

The child shall be given the opportunity to contribute, and arrangements shall be made for conversations with the child.