The mattresses and blankets were dirty and infested with lice. No pillows or bedding were provided.

While the applicant blamed her solicitor for various errors, the State should not be liable for this, or for any similar shortcomings by any other parties to the proceedings. 42.

Nor could he be blamed for requesting further expert reports or statements after S., B. and V. had given unfavourable reports.

    The applicant disputed the number of examined witnesses and documents and blamed the prosecution for having added up to the volume of the case. 58.

He was not given any blankets, which he requested. Nor was he given any food during these days. He was subject to constant abuse from his interrogators over this period.

disclosure of confidential information, its duty is nevertheless to impart – in a manner consistent with its obligations and responsibilities – information and ideas on all matters of public interest (see Bladet

Iceland , judgment of 25 June 1992, Series A no. 239, p. 28, § 63, and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-III). 38.

conjunction with Article 14 - The Court noted that it had already indicated, in the context of the complaints under Article 8, why it considered that the investigation and discharge together with the blanket

Where an immediate threat to democracy or independence had passed, measures identifying a credible threat to the State’s interests on the basis of specific information should be preferred to a blanket

    The Court has already concluded that the national authorities cannot be blamed for the fact that the circumstances of the applicant’s father’s disappearance have remained unknown.

The majority held that the correct reading of the 2000 Act was not that the information requested benefitted from a blanket exemption from disclosure, but rather that such information was taken outside

The detainees were provided with mattresses, blankets, pillows and towels which were appropriate for use. The towels and bed linen were changed every two weeks.

is noteworthy that throughout the proceedings only one request to postpone the hearing concerned a procedural demand by which the applicant exercised her defence rights, for which she could not be blamed

However, no existence of such a threat prior to the enactment of the ban in question had been shown and the Court perceived a risk that a blanket ban on the use of that symbol might also restrict its use

The applicant blamed the delay on the authorities and maintained his complaint.

In particular, the heirs cannot be blamed for their refusal to accept the garage offered to them in 2014 (see paragraph   9 above), since the reason given by them, that it was far away from their

Therefore, the Court notes that at the time of lodging the constitutional complaint the applicant still had a keen interest in accelerating the proceedings and he cannot be blamed for subsequently taking

BLASSEL DEBATS : à l'audience publique du 26 Mars 2008 ARRET : Contradictoire prononcé par sa mise à disposition au greffe le 30 Mai 2008, les parties présentes en ayant été préalablement avisées

BLASSEL COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DU DELIBERE JG. HUGLO : PRESIDENT DE CHAMBRE P. RICHEZ : CONSEILLER C.