CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0827JUD001285087
27 août 1992
The attack had been carried out by a commando of several persons wearing balaclava helmets to conceal their features.
Page 37 sur 215
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1117DEC007304701
17 novembre 2005
Following a series of attacks in 1972, several “RAF” members were arrested.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601JUD002157105
1 juin 2017
A photofit image of the attacker was created with the help of the victim’s description, but the member of parliament also added that he did not know who the attacker was. 8 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0407JUD000688411
7 avril 2015
The demonstrators split up, though some of them responded to the attack by throwing hard objects at the law-enforcement officers; armoured vehicles belonging to the carabinieri drove up at high speed,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0622JUD004016507
22 juin 2021
On 2 July 2005 the investigators questioned an officer of the Shelkovskoy district police who had visited the village shortly after the attack.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199
12 mai 2005
The National Security Court found that it had been established that, following decisions taken by the applicant and on his orders and instructions, the PKK had carried out several armed attacks, bomb attacks
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0110JUD001606490
10 janvier 2008
The Turkish military forces that carried out the attack consisted of a paratroops battalion, twenty tanks, as well as high ‑ angle guns.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529JUD003615004
29 mai 2012
The attack lasted for some twenty or thirty minutes. At about 2 or 2.30 p.m. two other military aircraft bombed the outskirts of the village. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0825JUD002345802
25 août 2009
Shortly afterwards, however, the demonstrators succeeded in pushing back the attack by the law-enforcement agencies.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0514JUD002181003
14 mai 2009
Attack of 7 September 2002 and death of the applicants’ relatives 1. The applicants’ account 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1106JUD003008605
6 novembre 2012
Mr Todorov did not talk or shoot back at the police, or react to their attacks in any other way. 25.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0114JUD002473315
14 janvier 2025
In the prosecutor’s view, the applicant, who was an educated adult with her own social circle, had been in a position to fend off unjust ( haksız ) attacks against her.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0312JUD004622199
12 mars 2003
The court held that it had been established that, following decisions taken by the applicant and on his orders and instructions, the PKK had carried out several armed attacks, bomb attacks, acts of sabotage
8e Section - MESD
DTA_2318239_20230809
9 août 2023
Ont été entendus au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Abdat, - les observations de Me Atiback, avocat commis d'office, représentant M. C, assisté de M.
1ère CHAMBRE CIVILE
6870a3132e3e3b1864ce21cc
10 juillet 2025
SELARL KPDB INTER-BARREAUX, avocat au barreau de BORDEAUX INTERVENANTE : CAISSE DES DEPOTS ET CONSIGNATION en la personne de son représentant légal agissant en tant que représentant de l'ATIACL
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1026JUD006565501
26 octobre 2006
During this terrorist attack, three people had been killed and 104 seriously injured. 8.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD008008613
15 janvier 2015
relève : « 10 May – The Darfur rebel group, the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM), launched an armed attack on Omdurman, one of the three towns that form greater Khartoum.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1210DEC001246186
10 décembre 1986
As the wife of a Palestinian, she would be open to attack by all the competing militia, even if she attempted to stay in a Palestinian camp.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0326JUD003049296
26 mars 2002
During his interrogation he confessed his involvement in the activities of the PKK, such as a bomb attack at premises of a political party.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0928DEC004817699
28 septembre 2004
The court decided that the remarks made by the applicant in his book did not constitute an attack on the reputation of the complainant. Mr Kilercioğlu appealed.