Considering that their silence amounted to a refusal, on 22 December the applicant company lodged a further application asking the administrative courts to annul what it considered to be a silent refusal

At that stage, she had not been given any instructions as to her right to legal assistance or her right to remain silent.

The appellate court’s judgment was silent as regards the applicant’s complaints concerning the unlawfulness of the searches and planting of evidence by the police.

Moreover, according to the record, he also stated that he did not want a lawyer or to remain silent.

Moreover, according to the record, the applicant also stated that she did not want a lawyer or to remain silent.

On the first page of the forms there was a pre-printed message stating, inter alia , that the person being questioned had the right to remain silent and the right to choose a lawyer.

Before questioning, however, suspects would be cautioned, that is, informed of their right to remain silent and that anything they said could be taken down and produced as evidence.

The record also stated that the applicant had been informed that he had the right to remain silent, but that he had indicated that he would nevertheless make statements to the police.

Thomas Siebert, conseiller. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 3 mars 2026. La rapporteure, F. Milin-Rance Le président, B. Coudert La greffière, A.

En considération d'une estimation du coût de viabilité des parcelles effectuée à sa demande par la SCP BELLANGER SILVERT, géomètres experts, elle ramène ses réclamations à titre principal à la fixation

Thomas Siebert, conseiller. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 18 novembre 2025. La rapporteure, F. Milin-Rance Le président, B. Coudert La greffière, A.

Thomas Siebert, conseiller. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 18 novembre 2025. La rapporteure, F. Milin-Rance Le président, B. Coudert La greffière, A.

Siebert, conseiller. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 16 septembre 2025. La rapporteure, G. Grandjean Le président, B. Coudert La greffière, I. 

cette qualité au siège social sis [Adresse 1] Représentée par Me Laurène D'AMIENS de la SCP CLAIRE LE BARAZER & LAURÈNE D'AMIENS, avocat au barreau de BORDEAUX et assistée de Me Jean-Christophe SIEBERT

decision to avail himself of his statutory right not to give evidence and therefore it had good reason for admitting F.’s untested statements as reported by the investigating judge at trial (compare Sievert

The applicant exercised his right to remain silent and declined to answer questions put to him by the police.

By 20 October 2004 the High Court questioned four defendants, while the fifth one wished to remain silent. It also ordered that the remaining three defendants be brought before the court.

A B, représenté par Me Silleres et Me Rosier, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 21 juin 2021 par lequel la rectrice de l'académie de Montpellier l'a affecté sur un poste au collège de la

It noted that it had invited the applicant to give a statement before the court in respect of the circumstances of the case and had informed him of his right to remain silent and of the fact that any statement