73049/01, § 83, ECHR   2007 ‑ I, and Chadzitaskos and Franta v. the Czech Republic , nos. 7398/07, 31244/07, 11993/08 and 3957/09, § 48, 27 September 2012), including those between private

Initially, the Privy Council considered that a condemned person could not complain about delay of his execution caused by his resort to appellate proceedings ( de Freitas v.

  26671/09 , § 22, 22 January 2015; see also Freitas Rangel v.   Portugal , no. 78873/13, § 37, 11 January 2022). THE CIVIL CODE 33 .

; In addition to the various cases cited in the present judgment and those where the interference served a more specific aim of “maintaining the authority ... of the judiciary” (see, most recently, Freitas

  35839/97, §   59, 22 February 2005, and Gouveia Gomes Fernandes and Freitas e Costa v.   Portugal , no. 1529/08, § 54, 29   March 2011).

  39324/07, §   55, 7 December 2010; Gouveia Gomes Fernandes and Freitas e Costa v.

expression, with the authorities thus having a particularly narrow margin of appreciation, will normally be accorded where the remarks concern a matter of public interest (see Gouveia Gomes Fernandes and Freitas

France [GC], no. 29369/10, § 126, ECHR 2015, and Freitas Rangel v. Portugal , no.   78873/13, § 51, 11 January 2022). 38 .

They all moved to the village of Frata, where they still live. 10.     Application no. 15998/05 31.