The applicant submitted that he was better able to look after his child. In her memorial in reply C.D.S. accused L.G.C. of having sexually abused the child. 12.

State where the child is, a period of less than one year has elapsed from the date of the wrongful removal or retention, the authority concerned shall order the return of the child forthwith.

It noted that the child had expressed that he felt as a full member of the K. family and that he strongly wished to be legally accepted as Mr K.’s child.

The court found against placing the child temporarily with his father in view of the underdeveloped relationship between father and child.

On 10   August   1992 the applicant was awarded interim access to the child by the Gdynia District Court. This allowed him to visit the child on Saturdays.

was not applicable, as there was no grave risk that the child would be exposed to physical or psychological harm or would be otherwise placed in an intolerable situation.

In 2011 a civil court ordered the applicant’s father to pay child support to the applicant in the amount of 2,000 Croatian kunas (HRK) per month.

On 18 January 2021 the Sofia City Court granted the applicant’s request and ordered that the child be returned to Germany.

    The Court reiterates that the applicants complained about determination and/or enforcement of child residence orders/contact rights and international child abduction.

that child.

On the same day the child care authority has been informed of this. On 12 March 2010 the hospital informed the child care authority that no one had picked the children from there.

Discrimination Inability of healthy couple with high risk of transmitting hereditary illness to obtain genetic screening of embryo prior to implantation: communicated   In 2006, after their first child

A US district court recognised the applicant as “the legal parent of any child born under the validated (…) agreement”.

In 1996, the District Court issued an interim order that the child should be placed with the mother.

She and her Dutch child moved to a shelter for victims of domestic violence, and her Dutch child was placed under a childcare supervision order.

When the child visited her mother on 17   December 1996 at the hotel where she was staying in Bristol, [the applicant] left her alone in the room and went away, leaving the child with feelings of

The parents are unable to properly take care of the child because of their disabilities.

The applicant filed a complaint against S.C. for child abduction and assault.