The Commission could not be blamed for having originally suspended the proceedings, as long as the plans concerning the noise protection zones had not entered into legal force.

goes hand in hand with a European supervision by the Court, whose task it is to give a final ruling on whether a restriction is reconcilable with freedom of expression as protected by Article 10 (see Bladet

Royaume-Uni , arrêt du 27   mars 1996, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996 ‑ II, p. 500, § 39, et Bladet Tromsø et Stensaas c. Norvège [GC], n o 21980/93, § 59, CEDH 1999 ‑ III).

  Royaume-Uni , arrêt du 27   mars 1996, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996 ‑ II, p. 500, §   39, et Bladet Tromsø et Stensaas   c.

expenses were actually and necessarily incurred in order to prevent or obtain redress for the matter found to constitute a violation of the Convention and were reasonable as to quantum (see, for instance, Bladet

Iceland , no. 46443/09, §   70, 10   July 2012; McVicar v. the United Kingdom , no. 46311/99, § 84, ECHR   2002-III; Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v.

  Royaume-Uni , arrêt du 27   mars 1996, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996 ‑ II, p. 500, §   39, et Bladet Tromsø et Stensaas c.

According to the applicant, the blankets were not washed regularly. The Government disputed that allegation. The cell did not have access to daylight and was equipped with a 100W electric lamp.

Italian law accepted the mother’s decision as a blanket ban on any request for information made by the applicant, regardless of the reason for or the legitimacy of that decision.

If one were to accept that a blanket and automatic prohibition on the right to vote of people under guardianship was justified because they were, based on their legal status, unable to make conscious and

The applicant then related his discussion with the woman who was aggrieved by her precarious living conditions resulting from profound social and economic changes in Russia, and blamed the worsening of

In that case the Court was struck by the blanket and indiscriminate nature of the power of retention of DNA records in England and Wales whereby the material could be retained without time-limits and irrespective

As the domestic courts are procedurally required to verify reception of summonses prior to the hearing, they cannot be blamed for adjournment of hearings due to the applicant's failure to supply correct

The blankets that had been provided had never been washed.

Consequently, the applicants cannot be blamed for rejecting this offer (see, a contrario , Bulycheva v. Russia , no.   24086/04, § 31, 8 April 2010). 31.

That case dealt with an unpublished policy followed by the Secretary of State between April 2006 and 9 September 2008 and which constituted a “near blanket ban” on the release from detention of foreign

Italie 17/07/2015 Renato LODI 1929 italienne Roberto CARLINO 153. 36195/15 Blazek et Martelli c.

The Court of Appeal could not be blamed for the delays caused by the parties' friendly settlement negotiations, the difficulties caused in respect of the taking of evidence which had made it necessary

In the present case, the Austrian courts were not to be blamed for their inactivity as initially, under the Turkish legislation applicable to the proceedings at issue, no decision on the custody could