CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

4 294 résultats pour « Atiback »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Tous
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113DEC005244608

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2012

13 novembre 2012

The applicant complained under Article   2 of the Convention about the lack of effective and thorough investigation into his son’s death as a result of an arson attack at his work place.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-247559

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2025

10 novembre 2025

against Lithuania lodged on 10 January 2024 communicated on 10 November 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a prisoner’s right to protection of his physical integrity from the attacks

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13001

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2020

13 octobre 2020

Therefore, in distinguishing between defamatory attacks on private persons, whose reputation as part and parcel of their families’ reputation remains within the scope of Article 8, and legitimate criticism

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2591

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2007

26 juillet 2007

The Court perceived strong and concordant indications militating against the Government’s allegation that a potential terrorist attack had been the true reason for banning the applicant’s meeting.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1719574-1802973

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2006

29 juin 2006

  The applicant was placed under investigation in connection with a series of terrorist attacks carried out in France and sentenced to life imprisonment on 25 December 1997 for the murder of three

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-183959

Admin. suprême

25 mai 2018

25 mai 2018

1 September 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the domestic authorities’ refusal to increase the applicants’ compensation for their relative’s death as a result of a terrorist attack

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3899

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2012

12 juin 2012

In particular, the second applicant had repeatedly justified suicide attacks in which civilians were killed in Israel, and neither he nor the association had distanced themselves from that stance during

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238347

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2024

6 novembre 2024

vehicle cannot stop to provide first aid to those injured without risking danger to his life and health, as it was in this case, because the neighbours or kin of the injured party react aggressively and attack

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188236

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2018

12 novembre 2018

The event was disrupted by violent verbal and physical attacks of counter-demonstrators. Instead of constraining them, the police arrested a group of the event participants, including the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208035

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2021

22 janvier 2021

The applicant did not report the attack, fearing for her life and believing that K.’s friends in the police force would shield him from criminal prosecution as he claimed they would. 6.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2432233-2626382

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2008

21 juillet 2008

On the morning of 14 August 1974, Turkish military forces, supported by tanks and with air cover, launched an attack on the area.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1018DEC000842802

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2005

18 octobre 2005

He was taken to the scenes of incidents, in order to describe the details of the bomb attacks. As he was threatened, he repeated everything the police forced him to say.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0607JUD006493501

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2005

7 juin 2005

The applicant was warned that another similar attack could in the future be classified as a criminal offence. 23.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020JUD007498901

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2005

20 octobre 2005

    The perpetrators of such an attack and anyone who has incited another to commit the attack shall be punished by a prison sentence of at least three months. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-233074

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2024

12 mars 2024

However, no person other than B.A. was suspected of being criminally involved in the attacks.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0713JUD003521108

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2021

13 juillet 2021

According to the information in the case file, the surveillance of the first applicant’s telephone conversations revealed plans for a bomb attack to be carried out on 11 March 2008 in the Bahçelievler

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1363403-1427354

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2005

7 juin 2005

fine of 50,000   Czech korunas (about 1,674 euros (EUR)) on the applicant, on the ground that he had insulted the court through false allegations which represented an insolent and unprecedented attack

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0120DEC001370218

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2026

20 janvier 2026

    The application concerns an attack upon the first applicant and the ensuing proceedings. Attack of 2013 and its consequences 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0202DEC007014201

Admin. suprême

2 février 2006

2 février 2006

While acknowledging the fact that the applicant’s property including his apartment in the block of flats at 5 Kosmonavtov Street had been destroyed as a result of an attack in 1995, the court noted that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0128DEC001198711

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2014

28 janvier 2014

It recorded that the Secretary of State’s case was that each of the men was party to the mass-casualty attack plot.

Source officielle

Page 36 sur 215

← PrécédentSuivant →