Marukyan, lawyers practising in Vanadzor. The Armenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr   G.

sous le numéro 450 623 103, agissant poursuites et diligences pris en la personne de son représentant légal domiciliè en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 4] [Localité 11] Représentée par Me Ariane LAMI

    On 7 December 2012 the applicant’s lawyer lodged a cassation appeal with the Supreme Court. 12.

Thereafter, the applicant was questioned by the investigator as a suspect in the presence of his lawyer.

Korneva, a lawyer practising in St Petersburg. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mr G.

Alexandre OO..., de M. et Mme M..., de Mme Clotide PP..., de Mme Claudette QQ..., de Mme Anne-Marie RR..., de M. et Mme SS..., de M. Eric TT..., de M. Frédéric UU..., de Mme Maryse VV..., de M.

Décision déférée à la Cour : Jugement du 08 Décembre 2021 - Tribunal de Commerce de PARIS - RG n° 2017066236 APPELANTS Monsieur [I] [X] Domicilié [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] Représenté par Me Alexandre

  Collignon, a lawyer practising in Amsterdam. The applicants in application no. 3568/20 are represented by Ms C. Wijnakker, a lawyer also practising in Amsterdam.

or degrading treatment) and   13 (right to an effective remedy), and that he was convicted on the basis of the statements extracted from him during that ill-treatment and in the absence of his lawyer

He stated that he had withdrawn his authorisation from his lawyer and thus he was no longer represented by a lawyer before the Court.

It is not accordingly possible to grant the lawyers’ requests nor there are statutory rules specifying compulsory time-limit to be given to the accused and their lawyers to prepare questions to be put

The applicant and his lawyer thus insisted that the internal inquiry had not been full and objective.

  With regard to the police detention centres and the prison in question in these cases, the Government notes that: the Alexandras Avenue Police Headquarters is no longer used for the detention of

  August 2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

and to be defended by a defence lawyer ...” 40 .

In the case of Alexandru Marian Iancu v.

xa0; January 2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Anatoly Kovler, President,   Peer Lorenzen,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Ruiz Soroa, a lawyer practising in Bilbao. The Spanish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr I.

    On 25 April 2012 the applicant’s lawyer lodged a cassation appeal with the Supreme Court ( Sąd Najwyższy ). 15.