CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0614JUD004290898
14 juin 2007
However, even though the Government have not sought to challenge these reports, the Court cannot for this reason alone accept without question the estimates made by the expert (see Loizidou v.
Page 36 sur 88
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD003817997
22 septembre 2009
As a result, they cannot invoke Turkish responsibility.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD001665490
The Court observes that these objections are identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112DEC002816015
12 janvier 2016
Yet, on the ECtHR’s approach, treating the present issue as falling within the text of article 5(1)(a), no complaint can apparently arise until the expiry of the tariff period, and any complaint can then
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127JUD001840591
27 janvier 2009
Consequently, I cannot agree with the finding of a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922JUD003739597
Although the heirs of a deceased applicant cannot claim a general right for the examination of the application brought by the latter to be continued by the Court (see Scherer v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0503JUD000647905
3 mai 2012
Nor can continuation of the detention be used to anticipate a custodial sentence (see Letellier v. France , 26 June 1991, § 51, Series A no. 207; Ilijkov v.
Chambre civile 1-1
69facbe1cdc6046d47be678e
5 mai 2026
: B0216 Me Philippe BOZZACCHI, avocat au barreau de PARIS APPELANTE **************** DIRECTION REGIONALE DES DOUANES [Localité 1] OUEST [Adresse 3] [Localité 4] représentée par Me Alexandre
19ème chambre civile
67ec2fa3dd062d9f810e1521
1 avril 2025
Il indique devoir acheter une voiture compte tenu de la raideur de son genou et de son obligation de se déplacer avec une canne.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502DEC006296414
2 mai 2017
This extension period can be of such length as the court considers necessary to protect members of the public from serious harm.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0131DEC003573304
31 janvier 2006
Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The first applicant, Mrs Rusana Rubina, and the second applicant, Mr Alexandr
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0221JUD001696510
21 février 2012
Hannes Karrer and Ms Alexandra Bianca Karrer (“the applicants”), on 16 March 2010. 2.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120JUD001616290
20 janvier 2009
In the case of Alexandrou v.
Pôle 4 - Chambre 1
6868b37575a2d196dbc1913f
4 juillet 2025
dispositions des articles 805 et 907 du code de procédure civile, l'affaire a été débattue le 18 décembre 2024 en audience publique, les avocats ne s'y étant pas opposé, devant Mme Catherine GIRARD-ALEXANDRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127JUD001840791
In this respect the Court observes that hindrance can amount to a violation of the Convention just like a legal impediment. 64.
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2013:C100679
26 juin 2013
ce dont il est tenu compte dans le calcul des charges cidessus soit pour son foyer une somme mensuelle de 11. 000 ¿ le couple assumant également ensemble la charge de leurs deux enfants Nicolas et Alexander
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1209JUD001309287
9 décembre 1994
The provisions of Article 3 para. 1 of the Constitution safeguard the holy canons and traditions of the Orthodox Church.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0716JUD002635903
16 juillet 2020
The Court considers that the serious interference with the applicants’ right to the peaceful enjoyment of their possessions cannot be adequately compensated for by the simple finding of a
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1020JUD002202303
20 octobre 2020
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127JUD001840391