Persons who interfered through deceit, threats, bribery or by other means with the free exercise by a citizen of Ukraine of his right to elect and to be elected, to conduct pre-election campaigning, or

The applicant (a qualified and formerly practising barrister) was elected as a Member of Parliament (“MP”) for the Labour Party in 1992, and remained an MP until May 2010, having been re-elected in three

Royaume-Uni précité, série A n° 25, p. 65, par. 162, et arrêt Tyrer c. Royaume-Uni du 25 avril 1978, série A n° 26, pp. 14-15, par. 29-30).

    The Court observes that under this head the applicants complained about two different matters. Firstly, they complained of a violation of their property rights over the villa.

up under regulations adopted by the Council of Ministers.

  In 1981 the socialist “PA.SO.K.” party under the leadership of Mr. Papandreou was elected to power in Greece.

[T] [X] alors qu’il était un jeune majeur en train de construire son autonomie et d’entrer pleinement dans la vie adulte (stage professionnalisant, inscription en auto-école).

et profond, et ses yeux, entourés d’un bleu électrique et rehaussés de vert.

According to the FCLM this in itself did not breach the applicant’s rights under Articles 6, 8 and 13 of the Convention.

He had even been granted a visa to enter Spain and had been allowed to leave Libya.

mother’s body; in cases listed under sub-paragraph 3 above, [abortion may be performed] until the end of the twelfth week of pregnancy. (3)     In cases listed under subsection (1), sub-paragraphs

      familiale mais aussi par rapport au respect de sa vie privée"       (rapport Comm. 15.3.90, par. 68).

Faris Vehabović, the judge elected in respect of Bosnia and Herzegovina, was unable to sit in the case (Rule 28).

  Repetitive cases (in which the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the European Convention on Human Rights) can be found at the end of this press

  The Ministry observed that, considering the case as a whole and having regard to the serious nature of the offence, the expulsion would not constitute a disproportionate measure vis-à-vis the members

a democratic State under the rule of law.

They may be re-elected at the end of their term of office.

He would further risk being killed by the clans since he had revealed their names under torture. 14.

He alleged that this was a breach of his rights under Articles 10 and 11 of the Convention, 18.