CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

12 118 résultats pour « Wize »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0904DEC001212986

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 1990

4 septembre 1990

          Subsequently, the applicant's wife was invited to give evidence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-185453

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2018

13 juillet 2018

    Killing of the applicant’s wife and abduction of his brother 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0918DEC005794600

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2001

18 septembre 2001

The applicant is a widower, his wife having died in June 1996. He cares for the three children of the marriage, born in 1988, 1989 and 1994.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1208DEC001964107

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2009

8 décembre 2009

He noted that following his release from prison, the applicant lived in a different town from his wife.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0321JUD003814420

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2023

21 mars 2023

    On 7 February 2020 the applicant lodged a new request with the prosecutor to be granted a visit from his wife and daughter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0918DEC003947298

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2001

18 septembre 2001

The applicant and his wife were married in 1990 and had two children, born in 1993 and 1996. The applicant’s wife died in 1997, aged 26 years. The applicant is the administrator of his wife’s estate.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-915780-941752

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2004

22 janvier 2004

The baby had kidney problems and the applicant’s wife, who was asthmatic, had suffered several attacks requiring visits to hospital.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208728

Admin. suprême

19 février 2021

19 février 2021

  1 that the Russian military alone and/or in cooperation with the South Ossetian military units set up a barbed wire fence “border” along the applicants’ villages, dividing their lands, resulting

Source officielle
CA

Chambre commerciale

6788a231b815c30a4df70bd4

Appel

15 janvier 2025

15 janvier 2025

Céline PIRET de la SCP VIAL-PECH DE LACLAUSE-ESCALE- KNOEPFFLER-HUOT-PIRET-JOUBES, avocat au barreau des PYRENEES-ORIENTALES, substituée par Me AGIER, avocat au barreau de MONTPELLIER S.A.S EYES WIDE

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-128026

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2013

9 octobre 2013

Later on in the proceedings the applicant partly retracted his confession and stated that he had unintentionally injured his wife.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110560

Admin. suprême

24 février 2012

24 février 2012

The evidence given by the applicant’s wife and by officer J.K. indicated that they had not seen any injuries.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-178419

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2017

11 octobre 2017

On 4   December 2013 the applicant’s wife was questioned as part of that investigation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249604

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2026

12 mars 2026

The applicant resided in the village of Stanytsya Luhanska, Luhansk region, together with his wife, Ms Tetyana Gazhemon, and mother-in law, Ms Anna Rybak.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1734977-1819108

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2006

13 juillet 2006

  In May 1995 the applicant and his wife P., a Romanian national, had a son, Pierre Albert.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0906DEC002694195

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 1995

6 septembre 1995

which the applicant and his wife had concluded the same day in court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1209DEC005684600

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2003

9 décembre 2003

His wife was unable to continue to run the business on her own and, as a result, in October 1996 they were both declared bankrupt.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1129DEC001949692

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 1995

29 novembre 1995

        The substantive proceedings were instituted by the applicant's wife before the Livorno court by summons of 21 November 1986.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179787

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2017

11 décembre 2017

She was asked to assess the credibility of the applicant’s wife and to determine whether she manifested the signs of a victim of abuse.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0503DEC005534117

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2022

3 mai 2022

  55341/17, they are parents, wife, children, siblings of Mr   Semed Nurmagomedov Aleksino, Moscow Region, Dagestan Republic   Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1126JUD002899520

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2024

26 novembre 2024

friend who ran a camel farm and his Swiss ex-wife.

Source officielle

Page 35 sur 606

← PrécédentSuivant →