Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6442
28 août 2012
28 août 2012
She was not assisted by a lawyer nor, she alleged, was she informed in advance of her right to remain silent.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC003918208
14 janvier 2014
14 janvier 2014
According to a form explaining arrested persons’ rights and which the applicant signed in acknowledgement, he was advised of the charges against him, as well as of his right to remain silent and to have
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1110DEC006422901
10 novembre 2005
10 novembre 2005
The Commission took no action further to that judgment despite a submission by the applicant of 2 December 1999 that it should have not remained silent.
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Montpellier
ORTA_2105623_20240530
30 mai 2024
30 mai 2024
Par des mémoires en défense, enregistrés les 19 novembre 2021, 13 juin 2022 et 24 juin 2022, le conseil départemental de l'Hérault, représenté par Me Silleres conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce qu'une
Source officielle4ème chambre-formation à 3
DCA_24MA00221_20250204
4 février 2025
4 février 2025
A, représenté par Mes Silleres et Rosier, demande à la Cour : 1°) d'annuler ce jugement du tribunal administratif de Marseille du 1er décembre 2023 ; 2°) d'annuler cet arrêté de la directrice générale
Source officielle2ème chambre
DCA_21TL02975_20230704
4 juillet 2023
4 juillet 2023
Par un mémoire en défense, enregistré le 14 octobre 2022, le département de l'Hérault, représenté par la SCP CGCB et associés, agissant par Me Silleres et Me Rosier, conclut au rejet de la requête et à
Source officielleVice-Président RABATE
DTA_2202018_20240506
6 mai 2024
6 mai 2024
B A, représenté par Me Sillères et Rosier, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler le titre de perception émis à l'encontre de la SNC Palavas Camping A B le 30 octobre 2017 et le rejet implicite de son recours
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4896
4 mars 2003
4 mars 2003
4.3.2003 [Section IV] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Loss and destruction of evidence: inadmissible Article 6-3-d Examination of witnesses Witness exercising the right to remain silent
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0906DEC003904110
6 septembre 2011
6 septembre 2011
The second applicant, E.A., stated that he wanted to exercise his right to remain silent; however, he gave some information about his presence at the scene of the incident.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-116059
17 décembre 2012
17 décembre 2012
against him; to receive a copy of the decision to initiate criminal proceedings against him or a copy of the arrest record; to make a deposition in relation to the suspicion against him or to remain silent
Source officielle3ème chambre
DTA_2300846_20250530
30 mai 2025
30 mai 2025
Rabaté, - les conclusions de Mme Delon, rapporteure publique, - et les observations de Me Silleres, pour le département de l'Hérault. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Montpellier
DTA_2204251_20220901
1 septembre 2022
1 septembre 2022
A, - les observations de Me Cadet, représentant la requérante, qui persiste dans ses conclusions et moyens, - et les observations de Me Sillères, représentant le département des Pyrénées-Orientales
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0323JUD002843903
23 mars 2010
23 mars 2010
In the meantime, on an unspecified date, the applicant signed a pre ‑ printed form explaining the rights of arrested persons, including the right to remain silent and the right to
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327DEC000000405
27 mars 2008
27 mars 2008
COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 6 §§ 1 and 2 of the Convention that he had been subject to compulsion to give incriminating evidence in violation of the right to remain silent and the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327DEC001788803
27 mars 2008
27 mars 2008
COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 6 §§ 1 and 2 of the Convention that he had been subject to compulsion to give incriminating evidence in violation of the right to remain silent
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204151
8 juillet 2020
8 juillet 2020
Committee in these cases and to the violations established of Article 6, paragraphs 1, and 3 c) of the Convention (lack of legal assistance in police custody and of notification of the right to remain silent
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2061
29 mai 2012
29 mai 2012
However, after six (and again after seven) hours’ confinement the authorities had decided to continue the restraint on the grounds that the applicant’s “behaviour” was “abnormal” although he was “silent
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9484
8 avril 2014
8 avril 2014
Later that day the applicant was informed of the charges against him and of the fact that he had a right to remain silent and to see a lawyer.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10218
14 octobre 2014
14 octobre 2014
interpreted, and of forming as accurate an idea as possible of the alleged offences, the applicant had not been able to appreciate fully the consequences of her alleged waiver of her rights to keep silent
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-145298
6 juin 2014
6 juin 2014
He had been advised of the charges against him, as well as of his right to remain silent and to have access to a lawyer.
Source officiellePage 35 sur 115