CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0715JUD006968612
15 juillet 2021
Merits The parties’ submissions 47.
Page 35 sur 145
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD001420407
15 janvier 2015
at both his home and his work address.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0512DEC001850791
12 mai 1994
The request shall further contain the addresses of those applying for proceedings to be instituted and, as far as possible, the addresses of all those affected by the proceedings (section 41, subsection
Cour d'Appel
6253c9a9bd3db21cbdd88f6e
21 décembre 2006
Y... n'a jamais cherché à faire jouer l'assurance souscrite, qu'il n'avait aucune raison de suspecter l'opération et que 496 autres investisseurs ont été floués ; Considérant que monsieur X... a adressé
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621DEC000261510
21 juin 2011
At the end of the hearing the applicant’s lawyer did not file a motion to submit additional evidence and delivered a closing address, noting that the criminal proceedings could have been instituted at
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0503DEC005216799
3 mai 2005
On 13 May 1997 the District Administrative Authority ordered the applicant to disclose pursuant to Section 103 § 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act ( Kraftfahrzeuggesetz ) the full name and address of the person
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0116DEC002505094
16 janvier 1996
When visiting him at his place of work the applicant did not know his own address but had agreed to show his home to the police.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-140815
5 décembre 2013
An additional search warrant was issued in respect of six addresses including the applicants’ house.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2279964-2451145
4 mars 2008
He had also only briefly examined the differences concerning the beating of the applicant and had failed to address the common points in the statements, notably those which inferred that the applicant
cr
61372542cd5801467741c485
8 décembre 1993
qu'il résulte de ces divers éléments que la société SCAPAV a passé commande d'une campagne publicitaire à la société Regiex après avoir acheté le produit incriminé et lui a communiqué le nom et les adresses
6137269acd58014677426f21
25 mai 2005
qu'il faisait nuit, ce témoin ayant expressément indiqué que le véhicule est passé devant l'entrée de son immeuble de sorte qu'elle a pu en connaître les occupants, ce témoignage ayant en outre le mérite
6137269dcd5801467742710b
31 mars 2005
en invoquant qu'il doit prendre des médicaments incompatibles avec le vin ; qu'il aurait pendant le dîner largement évoqué la question du détournement de mineurs, aurait vanté en termes exagérés les mérites
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1018DEC004877399
18 octobre 2001
COMPLAINT The applicant complains of the fact that the Constitutional Court failed to decide his constitutional complaint but merely terminated the proceedings due to the enactment of new legislation.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0917DEC005722213
17 septembre 2019
In his observations, the applicant merely stated that he maintained all allegations made in the applicant form. The Court’s assessment 24.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0226JUD002466217
26 février 2026
The Court does not find it necessary to address the above ‑ mentioned objections, given that the complaint is inadmissible for the following reasons. 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0830DEC001582806
30 août 2011
Ultimately, the Court observes that the applicant merely objects to the outcome of the proceedings and criticises the way in which the domestic courts assessed the facts of the case.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155537
26 mai 2015
It distinguished between cases where the delay had merely led to feelings of frustration and those where it had been established that, but for the delay in the holding of the hearing, the applicant would
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0505DEC005513720
5 mai 2026
The Court does not consider it necessary to address all the objections to the admissibility of the application raised by the Government (namely that the application had been lodged outside
ECLI:CEDH:001-146611
1 septembre 2014
On the merits the Constitutional Court considered that there could not be a violation solely because the law did not provide for such assistance, independent of any other factors.
PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1723669-1807285
11 juillet 2006
The Court was not satisfied that the method, which had already resulted in the deaths of two people in Germany, entailed merely negligible health risks.