D.H., arrêt Le Compte, Van Leuven et De Meyere c. Belgique du 23 juin 1981, série A n° 43, p. 25, par. 59). Dès lors, ils avaient droit à la publicité de l'instance.   38.

Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 25, para. 58).

La Cour a toujours considéré qu’un lien ténu ou des répercussions lointaines ne suffisent pas à faire entrer en jeu l’article 6 § 1 (voir les arrêts suivants : Le Compte, Van Leuven et De Meyere c.

Court rejected the applicant's statement of claim under Article 189 of the Code of Civil Procedure by which she had requested recognition ( ustalenie ) that she had been working as a forced labourer in Leutzen

The Association’s promotional leaflet   On 27 October 2000 the official launch of the Association took place in a hotel in Skopje, the capital of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

In addition, the Government stated in July 1998 that the applicant had been admonished for preaching and distributing leaflets to other patients and staff, as he was not allowed to disturb others in the

The Association’s promotional leaflet 16.   On 27 October 2000 the official launch of the Association took place in a hotel in Skopje, the capital of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

that a product is ‘presented for treating or preventing disease’ within the meaning of Directive 65/65 not only when it is expressly ‘indicated’ or ‘recommended’ as such, possibly by means of labels, leaflets

The objective of a completely tobacco-free prison environment was set in 2016, and relevant information leaflets were distributed in prisons. 73 .

Its activities in Germany included the distribution of leaflets and brochures and the distribution of information via internet as well as, more recently, the organisation of public events. 5.

The SSD also provided the court with a copy of the “Project presentation leaflet on the data storage facility by AmberCore DC”, in which Gazprom had been mentioned among the “partners” or “customers” of

  In that paragraph the Court referred to paragraph 44 of its Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1981(6) and to paragraph 81 of its Sporrong and Lönnroth v.

While the term “dispute” should not be construed too technically and should be given “a substantive rather than a formal meaning” (see Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v.

  35, §   49; Aannemersbedrijf Gebroeders Van Leeuwen B.V. v. The Netherlands (dec.), no. 32602/96, 25 January 2000).

    The third applicant was accused of having distributed DHKP/C leaflets on 9   October 1995 in a high school and having written DHKP/C slogans on 20   December 1995. 11.

[Localité 3] inscrite au RCS de MARSEILLE n° 520 711 771poursuites et diligences de son représentant légalen exercice domicilié ès qualité au siège social sis, demeurant [Adresse 1] représentée par

It also contained information about the activities of the DSIH, such as attempting to throw Molotov cocktails into banks, hanging banners with fake bombs attached to them, and distributing illegal leaflets

      The Constitutional Court found no objection in constitutional law to the consideration of the texts from the point of view of the average reader, in particular as the leaflet

Basing itself on the leaflets and the receipt vouchers of the organisation captured from the applicant’s residence, the witnesses’ statements, the cartridge clips and guns seized during the investigation