CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

50 615 résultats pour « Folzing »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0523DEC004274098

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2002

23 mai 2002

THE LAW Following informal contacts between the applicants’ and the Government’s representatives, the Section Registrar was asked to assist the parties in reaching a solution to the matter.

Page 35 sur 2531

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0523DEC006617301

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2002

23 mai 2002

Following the applicants’ request for increased compensation, on 11   December 1997, the Marmara Ereğlisi Civil Court of General Jurisdiction awarded them additional compensation plus interest at

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0620DEC004017598

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2002

20 juin 2002

Following the applicants’ request for increased compensation, on 9   December 1996, the Marmara Ereğlisi Civil Court of General Jurisdiction awarded them additional compensation plus interest at the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0228DEC006763301

Admin. suprême

28 février 2002

28 février 2002

THE LAW Following informal contacts between the applicants’ and the Government’s representatives, the Section Registrar was asked to assist the parties in reaching a solution to the matter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0918DEC007460801

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2003

18 septembre 2003

Following the applicants' request for increased compensation, on   8   July   1996 the Aydın Civil Court of General Jurisdiction awarded them additional compensation plus an interest at

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0404JUD003142396

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2000

4 avril 2000

Valticos , ad hoc judge , and also of Mr M. de Salvia , Registrar , Having deliberated in private, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on 31 March 2000: PROCEDURE 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0924JUD003052696

Admin. suprême

24 septembre 2002

24 septembre 2002

O'Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 3 September 2002, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7376

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2013

17 janvier 2013

Following the operation, relatives of the applicants complained to various State authorities about the alleged ill-treatment and arbitrary transfer of the prisoners.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2239695-2391899

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2008

18 janvier 2008

    Repetitive cases   The following cases raise issues which have already been submitted to the Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230867

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2024

11 janvier 2024

On 16 August 2017, following an alleged call about the child being routinely unattended, the Arandjelovac Social Care Centre inspected the applicants’ house while the first applicant, the child’s mother

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1214JUD004189298

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 1999

14 décembre 1999

Fribergh , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 2 December 1999, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0929DEC006690101

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2005

29 septembre 2005

COMPLAINTS The applicants complain under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that they were paid insufficient interest on additional compensation received following the expropriation of the plots of land.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2305994-2480587

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2008

28 mars 2008

On 19 December 2000 they were remanded in custody for insulting a public prosecutor and police officers following a search carried out at the home of the first two applicants.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0319DEC007598411

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2024

19 mars 2024

It also finds that the authorities have acted speedily following the Court’s judgment in Gjonbocari and Others. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242805

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2025

19 mars 2025

The applicant filed a challenge against it the following day.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238702

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2024

25 novembre 2024

In November 2023, the Juvenile Court, following several requests from the first applicant, took note of the fact that the December 2022 measure had not been enforced.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-424013-424399

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2001

2 octobre 2001

  The case has been struck out following a friendly settlement in which the Turkish Government have made the following declaration:   “The Government regret the occurrence, as in the case in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0307DEC004278998

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2002

7 mars 2002

THE LAW Following informal contacts between the applicants’ and the Government’s representatives, the Section Registrar was asked to assist the parties in reaching a solution to the matter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0329JUD001145485

Admin. suprême

29 mars 1990

29 mars 1990

Petzold , Deputy Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 26 March 1990, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE AND FACTS 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0228DEC004274398

Admin. suprême

28 février 2002

28 février 2002

THE LAW Following informal contacts between the applicants’ and the Government’s representatives, the Section Registrar was asked to assist the parties in reaching a solution to the matter.

Source officielle