29462/95, §   76, ECHR 2000 ‑ XII and Danilov v. Ukraine , no.   2585/06, §§   64-67, 13   March   2014)   B.

Accordingly, the Court cannot accept the Government’s assertion as plausible (see Danilov v. Ukraine, no. 2585/06, §   64, 13 March 2014). 65.

  29462/95, §   76, ECHR 2000 ‑ XII; Danilov v. Ukraine , no.   2585/06, §§   65-67, 13   March   2014; and Sylenok and Tekhnoservis-Plus v.   Ukraine , no.

  19502/19* 26/03/2019 Ameksey Yuryevich DANILOV 1979 Nataliya Petrovna Saratovskaya Cheboksary IK-6 Chuvashia Republic 12/05/2018 to 06/02/2019 8 month(s) and 26   day(s) <2 m² lack of fresh

xa0;   Delays in taking medical and other evidence; impairments in apprising applicant of procedural developments and ensuring her access to investigative procedure (for relevant examples, see Danilov

important procedural steps such as ordering forensic assessment of applicant’s injuries and limited participation of applicant in investigation as recognised by domestic court (for relevant examples, see Danilov

June   2019); (iv)     Delays in taking procedural steps leading to loss of evidence; notably, forensic assessment ordered ten days after complaint lodged (for relevant examples, see Danilov

  57508/21 29/10/2021 Danila Andreyevich ZHAVORONKOV 2002 Ilya Vladimirovich Zhernosek Krasnoyarsk Rally “Free Navalnyy”   Krasnoyarsk   23/01/2021 article 20.2 § 5 of CAO fine of RUB &#

            39456/16 24/06/2016 Tatyana Aleksandrovna PASHKINA 07/05/1953 Krasnodar   Yevgeniy Anatolyebich LEVIN 26/01/1969 Krasnodar   Danila

  Russia 13/09/2022 Daniil Dmitrieyvich BLAGOV 1999 Kaliningrad                  48104/22 Yanovskaya v.

report on 31/01/2021;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. 4,000   57508/21 29/10/2021 Danila

cases applicants may well be expected to submit at least a detailed account of the facts complained of and provide – to the greatest possible extent – some evidence in support of their complaints (see Danilov

questioning him, organising confrontations or posing specific questions to the Kyiv police officer and the forensic medical expert who had examined the applicant on 17 and 18 August 2005 respectively (see Danilov

lt;2 m² 3 toilet(s) overcrowding, no or restricted access to warm water, no or restricted access to potable water, insufficient number of sleeping places   4620/19 21/12/2018 Dmitriy Yuryevich DANILOV

restricted access to shower, no or restricted access to warm water, passive smoking, infestation of cell with insects/rodents, inadequate temperature   54260/17 12/07/2017 Nikolay Vladimirovich DANILOV

The domestic investigation was silent on this initial diagnosis, including on the question of whether or not it had been accurate (see Danilov v. Ukraine , no.

Also, no explanation was provided in respect of the specific techniques applied and how they correlated with the applicant’s particular actions (see   Danilov v.

Likewise, it does not explain which specific techniques were applied, and how they correlated to the applicant’s particular actions (see, Danilov v.   Ukraine , no.

Final decision: Moscow City Court, 20/04/2021 4,000   33212/21 08/06/2021 Vitaliy Yuryevich POTAPOV 1988 Polyakov Daniil Alekseyevich Voronezh Manifestation against amendments to the Constitution