CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

20 088 résultats pour « Conerardy »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Tous
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-198336

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2019

8 octobre 2019

  QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-198339

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2019

8 octobre 2019

  QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-166885

Admin. suprême

1 septembre 2016

1 septembre 2016

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article   10 of the Convention in that he was convicted on 25   March 2013 by the Schwerin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187207

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2018

29 septembre 2018

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to freedom of expression contrary to Article   10 of the Convention (see Karácsony and   Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179945

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2017

8 décembre 2017

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his property rights guaranteed by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, contrary to Article   14 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-161930

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2016

14 mars 2016

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the ground of his re-employment in the public sphere, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-211383

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2021

30 juin 2021

    QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her private and family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-206174

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2020

19 octobre 2020

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-112398

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2012

3 juillet 2012

In particular, was the applicant’s detention without a court order after initial seventy-two hours of his detention, that is between 14.45 and 16.00 on 8 November 2010, contrary to the domestic law?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-237744

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2023

20 mars 2023

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Kyprianou v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-213892

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2021

10 novembre 2021

  QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his private life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention (see, for example, Hachette Filipacchi

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-228239

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2023

20 septembre 2023

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-218821

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2022

8 juillet 2022

lodged administrative proceedings against the decision of the Emergency Committee for the Harghita County rendering the mask obligatory in certain public spaces and claimed that this decision was contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-199547

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2019

25 novembre 2019

QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Bearing in mind the applicant’s complaint and the criteria established by the Court’s case-law, has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188040

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2018

5 novembre 2018

s liability in civil defamation proceedings on account of the passage relating to N.T., a person involved in politics, has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to freedom of expression, contrary

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-210653

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2021

27 mai 2021

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention, in so far as the Olt County Court, in its final decision

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-222948

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2023

11 janvier 2023

    Is the fact that no final decision has yet been adopted in the context of the ongoing criminal investigation contrary to the applicant’s right to an effective remedy under Article  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-233345

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2024

26 mars 2024

    Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, contrary to Article   8 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217506

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2022

3 mai 2022

    Has the applicant been subjected to a difference in treatment in enjoyment of his rights under Article 9 of the Convention, contrary to Article   14 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-172192

Admin. suprême

24 février 2017

24 février 2017

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to respect for their family life, contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, in so far as the enforcement of the decisions adopted

Source officielle

Page 35 sur 1005

← PrécédentSuivant →