Mr Stochlak brought proceedings for the return of the child in January 1997. On 7 March 1997 the district court ordered that the child be returned to her father.

Subsequently the child had been put up for adoption and the applicant’s visiting rights had been suspended.

Article 11 - Return of the child “1.

24 mars 1986) d'avoir, à la demande de la CGT, décidé que, pour les élections des délégués du personnel de la société Travexpos Ranno, la collectivité des salariés affectés au siège et au dépôt de Chilly-Mazarin

child to Israel, failing which her action would be classified as a “wrongful removal of a child” under the Hague Convention of 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.

the child.

The child was declared abandoned on 16   November 2001 and placed in a children’s home.

Consequently, the contact confused the child.

    On 14 July 2020 the Zaporizhzhya Court of Appeal ordered the return of the child to her father in Mexico, pursuant to the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction

The applicant has a granddaughter (“the child”) born on 3 May 1995, the common child of her daughter (“the mother”) and her daughter's former husband (“the father”).

However, the mother continued to deny access to the child. 16.

(IX. 10.) on Child Custody Boards, Child Protection Procedure and Child Custody Board Procedure provides as follows: Section 27 “(1) The aim of the access rights is: a) to maintain family contact between

Protection (“the child protection authority”).

and to subject his contact with the child on condition of the mother’s prior consent.

from the habitual residence in Romania and the refusal of the Moldovan courts to order his return under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International   Child Abduction.

The couple had a child in 1990., but separated in 1991.

In February 1997, while exercising his contact right, the father flew to the United States with the child.

On 23 September 1992, the mother obtained an interim order for the delivery of the child to her, and the child lived with the mother and an older child thereafter.

On 23 July 2010 the mother had failed to hand over the child to the supervisor, and induced the child to declare that he did not wish any contacts.