THE LAW Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

in tort was an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have the violation of the Convention acknowledged, either explicitly or in substance, and to receive

avoid contact, in order to prevent irremediable psychiatric trauma and to allow her to calm down and “modify her sexualised behaviour”.

State to third parties. 2.

the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations of Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 due to the ineffectiveness

in tort was an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have the violation of the Convention acknowledged, either explicitly or in substance, and to receive

to third parties. 2.

No restrictions shall be applied to him except such as are necessary to secure the proper conduct of criminal proceedings, to maintain order and security in a remand centre and to prevent demoralisation

to enable the persons concerned to foresee, to a degree that was reasonable in the circumstances, the consequences which a given action might entail and to regulate their conduct accordingly.

According to both the Government and the applicants, they continue to be part of the ongoing investigation. 9.

, to the fear that the applicant might attempt to abscond.

Article 3 reads as follows: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” Admissibility The parties’ submissions 23.

Its right to a hearing by a tribunal and its right to a fair trial had been denied. Its right to an effective remedy did not exist.

Whether it is reasonable for an accused to remain in detention must be assessed in each case according to its special features.

to sell him Apartment 18. 9.

as to quantum (see Can and Others v.

Residents assigned to the dormitories had been given plastic partitions, to be used to divide the communal area into relatively private sections.

    The applicant neither alleges to have been vaccinated against COVID ‑ 19, nor does he allege to have been subjected to any individual measure against him.

  1 (right to education).   Adam v.