CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 564 résultats pour « STUBBE Marc »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC001842810

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2013

17 septembre 2013

In its reasoning, the Constitutional Court held, inter alia , that the District Court’s decision of 26   March 2008 had misinterpreted the character of the memorial of 11 July 2007.

Page 34 sur 79

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1023JUD005011713

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2018

23 octobre 2018

Russia [GC], no. 35589/08, §§ 76-78, 30 March 2017). However, as regards the costs and expenses, the Court awards to the applicant in application no. 68381/13 the sum indicated in the appended table.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0301JUD003801503

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2007

1 mars 2007

The District Court adjourned the examination of the case until 23 March 2000 to allow the applicant to prepare questions to experts. 11 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0327DEC001634702

Admin. suprême

27 mars 2007

27 mars 2007

On 22   March   2000 the Sumy Regional Court (the “Sumy Court”) rejected the applicant’s appeal in cassation. B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1208DEC001500909

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2009

8 décembre 2009

The request was refused by the Acting President of the Section on 25 March 2009, confirmed by a Chamber of the Section on 31   March 2009. 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1022JUD000535311

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 2013

22 octobre 2013

    On 2 March 2007 the Užice Municipal Court ruled in favour of the applicant and ordered the debtor to pay him: (a)     salary arrears in the amount of 8,232 Serbian dinars (RSD)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0125DEC004459998

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2000

25 janvier 2000

On 24 March 1995 the applicant made further representations and on 12 May 1995 he was granted indefinite leave to remain as a foreign spouse.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627DEC004192011

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2017

27 juin 2017

    According to the applicant, he had learned of the Fund’s decision of 11   July   2001 (see paragraph 7 above) when his relatives had informed him, in March 2010, of the enforcement

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1124JUD005006713

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2016

24 novembre 2016

Ukraine , no. 21454/04, §§   50 ‑ 51 and 61, 3 March 2011). 36.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-212928

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2021

8 octobre 2021

    On 31 March 2017 the Refugee Board dismissed the applicant’s appeal, upholding the decision of 15 February 2017.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0925DEC004006618

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2025

25 septembre 2025

    On 29   March 2017 the HQCJ decided to set the minimum admissible score for the first stage of the competition (an anonymous test and written practical assignment) at 127   points

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0110JUD002908612

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2017

10 janvier 2017

On completing a business-studies course in Basle, he returned temporarily to Turkey to attend classes in Islamic studies; while there, he met the second applicant, who became his wife.

Source officielle
CC

comm

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CO00904

Cassation

14 novembre 2018

14 novembre 2018

1°/ la société Skymarc Farm Inc, dont le siège est [...] , 2°/ la société Petra Bloodstock Agency Ltd, dont le siège est [...] ), contre deux ordonnances n° RG : 16/03837 et 16/03838 rendues le 27 mars

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530JUD004897409

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2017

30 mai 2017

    On 5 March 2009 the applicant asked the investigator to allow his wife to visit him in the remand prison. 19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0529DEC004885217

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2018

29 mai 2018

There were reasons to assume that he perceived that the studies strengthened his political project.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0707JUD007261114

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2022

7 juillet 2022

Belgium , no. 82284/17, §   58, 31   March 2020). 54.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-172037

Admin. suprême

18 février 2017

18 février 2017

On 6 October and 8 December 2005, as well as on 6 March and 7 April 2006, the Kyiv Court extended the applicant’s pre-trial detention, respectively, to twenty-two, twenty-five, twenty-six and twenty-seven

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-223786

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2023

2 mars 2023

20 Aleksandr Andreyevich KOSTYUK against Russia and 12 other applications (see list appended) PROCEDURAL INFORMATION Following a preliminary examination of the admissibility of the applications on 2 March

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0905DEC002683202

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2006

5 septembre 2006

In that case, the applicant had been granted a residence permit for his studies at a university.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904DEC007142812

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2018

4 septembre 2018

    Shortly afterwards, police sergeant L.L. was skirting round a container when he once again came face-to-face with L.M., who made one unsuccessful attempt to stab him, and then tried again

Source officielle