The ICTR Statute does not establish a hierarchy of norms, but rather all three offences are presented on an equal footing.

    The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the

  The Romanian authorities stated that on 16 December 1999, following an argument, I.C. had decided to leave the marital home with his son.

On 3 August 2011 the Lori Regional Court decided to grant the Mayor’s claim partially, reaching the following findings.

Fifteen hearings were adjourned following his requests or due to his failure to appear, which protracted the proceedings by nine and a half months approximately.

A chest X-ray performed the following day revealed no changes.

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu que Mme X... a été engagée par la société Fraikin-Follin le 9 novembre 1992 en qualité d'agent

    The judgment shall be served on the parties, who did not attend the hearing, within five days following its pronouncement [...]. 4.

Registrar   CHAMBER JUDGMENTS CONCERNING CZECH REPUBLIC, AUSTRIA, FRANCE AND GREECE     The European Court of Human Rights notified in writing yesterday 1 chamber judgment [1] in the following

  Following an attempted collective break-out from Centre 127, the applicants were transferred on 22 January 2003 to the Closed Detention Centre for Illegal Aliens in Bruges.

In 2001, following a hearing in public, the court of appeal quashed the judgment and remitted the case to the first‑instance lustration court.

The detention was to prevent her from interfering with the course of justice following a raid codenamed Storm ( Búrka ) in connection with a large-scale investigation aimed at alleged organised corruption

In addition, the following facts are relevant to the present case.

Following the death of Mr Pisakiewicz, the Court awarded his partner 1,500   euros   (EUR) in respect of non-pecuniary damage.

On 25 September 1996, following the defendant's request, the Regional Court postponed the hearing to 15 November 1996.

The applicant submitted the following evidence in support of the above allegations: a statement by a cellmate. B.

    The applicants are/were all Danish nationals and are in the following referred to under A to G/G1, and K to L.

In this connection he relied mainly on the following provisions of Article 6 (art. 6) of the Convention: "1.

Zupančič,   Alvina Gyulumyan,   Egbert Myjer,   Ineta Ziemele, judges, and Stanley Naismith, Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 9 June 2009 Delivers the following