Did the conditions of the applicant’s detention change during that period?

During their detention, they were transferred to hospitals on various dates for medical examinations and treatments.

The courts relied mainly on the covert recordings of the applicant’s telephone conversations at various times during the period from 1 to 4 July 2014.

According to the court, the fact that the applicant unsubscribed from those insurances did not render the amounts unduly paid and this irrespectively of whether the time ‑ span during which he had

It further pertains to the allegation of the applicant’s inability to examine or have examined the witnesses during the criminal proceedings (see Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no.

Detention during Her Majesty’s pleasure 21.

nearly 11 %, during his second detention – 3%, during his third detention – 14 % and during his fourth detention – nearly 4 %. 2.

the pre-trial investigations or during the court proceedings.

those issues had been examined during the pre-trial investigation and the trial and had been rejected as unfounded.

the pre-trial investigations or during the court proceedings.

He was allegedly beaten severely on his neck and back during his arrest, which was witnessed by many of his relatives, including his children.

    The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.

transport - poor conditions of detention during transport by vans, trains on several occasions between 14/06/2019-06/08/2020: insufficient number of sleeping places, overcrowding, no or restricted access

    The applicant complained that he had been confined in a metal cage during the court hearings which had taken place in 2013.

On 19 January 2012, during a court hearing, the applicant complained that he did not feel well. An ambulance was therefore called.

As a result, he and his lawyer studied the file during the period from 12 December 2012 to 2 March 2013 almost every day for about two hours per day. The trial continued during that period. 10.

During the next hour, the police staff checked on D.B. every five or six minutes.

During one such identification parade on 18 February 2019 the alleged perpetrator walked into the room where she was.

He submitted, inter alia , that his right to legal defence had not been ensured because during the hearing he had not been represented by a lawyer of his own choosing and because the representation by