On 29 April 1992 the President of the Gdańsk Regional Court ( Sąd Wojewódzki ), in reply to the applicants’ complaints, explained that the delay in the proceedings related to the expert opinions which

    The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the excessive delay in the enforcement of the judgment of the Aiud District Court of 8 July 2009. 13.

    53110/20 09/11/2020 János Oszkár FARAGÓ 1980 Karsai Dániel András Budapest Art. 5 (4) - excessive length of judicial review of detention - The obligatory review was carried out with a delay

Délibéré après l'audience du 8 février 2024, à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Dely, présidente, Mme Rivet, première conseillère, M.

Mme Isabelle Dely, présidente du tribunal, a exercé les fonctions de responsable du centre de recherche et de documentation de la CNDA entre septembre 2015 et septembre 2020 puis de vice-présidente de

La présidente du tribunal a désigné Mme Dely, Vice-Présidente, en application de l'article R. 222-1 du code de justice administrative pour statuer selon la procédure prévue par cet article.

delays in the proceedings. 31.

The agreement also notes that the undue delays in the proceedings amounted to more than four years.

On 30 May 2005 the Town Court awarded the applicant RUB 3,204.51 as compensation for inflationary losses caused by the delay in the enforcement of the judgment of 27 June 2003.

As regards the period of time between the lodging of the appeals in cassation and the judgments of the Supreme Court, that court found that neither this delay in itself nor the delay as a part of the entire

through the delay in the enforcement.

The Constitutional Court ordered the Prievidza District Court to proceed with the case without further delay.

The delay in its enforcement was thus slightly more than ten months, which, in the Court’s view, does not appear excessive (see Grishchenko v. Russia (dec.), no.

    The applicants complained about the delay in the enforcement of the judgment debt against the State.

Didier Z..., SARL DA SILVA, SA AVIVA ASSURANCES, Compagnie d'assurances ALLIANZ IARD JCS-iB travaux malfaçons Grosse délivrée à Maître DELPY, avocat COUR D'APPEL DE LIMOGES CHAMBRE CIVILE

  The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter “the Convention”) ;   Deeply

interim resolutions and numerous decisions, called upon the authorities to adopt, as a matter of priority, the necessary measures in its domestic legal system and to take resolute action without further delay

the highest level of government and expressing its strong expectation that the measures required to provide   restitutio in integrum   to these applicants will be adopted without any further delay

Even assuming that there had been such a delay, the applicants could not claim redress therefor.