CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0405JUD001905918
5 avril 2022
powers under section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (see paragraph 36 below) to read down the provisions of the 1978 Act in a way that would completely change, and possibly even reverse, its meaning
Page 34 sur 42
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0315DEC001291719
15 mars 2022
15 March 2022 as a Chamber composed of: Yonko Grozev, President, Armen Harutyunyan, Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, Pere Pastor Vilanova, Jolien Schukking, Ana
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1107JUD004362913
7 novembre 2017
The Government submitted that the applications specified in Appendix A should be rejected as being an abuse of the right of individual application, within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0615JUD001766517
15 juin 2021
The Court does not consider that these complaints are manifestly ill ‑ founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0113JUD000274621
13 janvier 2026
European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Lado Chanturia , President , Jolien Schukking, Faris Vehabović, Anja Seibert-Fohr, Ana
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0908JUD002264908
8 septembre 2020
Serghides, Helen Keller, Dmitry Dedov, Alena Poláčková, Lorraine Schembri Orland, Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges, and Milan Blaško, Section Registrar, Having regard
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0219JUD001040112
19 février 2015
spinal conditions are currently stable and unlikely to worsen, but could improve with proper treatment; - The various disorders observed, in terms of both traumatic spinal cord injuries and anal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0204JUD005090199
4 février 2003
He submitted that his placement in the EBI had had serious consequences for his possibilities of enjoying private and family life within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention: both privacy
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1013REP001185585
13 octobre 1988
om köpeskillingen eller annan ersättning inte endast obetydligt överstiger egendomens värde med hänsyn till dess
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0518JUD006400411
18 mai 2021
Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Jolien Schukking, President, Armen Harutyunyan, Ana Maria Guerra Martins, judges,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0503JUD003908715
3 mai 2022
sitting as a Chamber composed of: Yonko Grozev, President, Tim Eicke, Armen Harutyunyan, Gabriele Kucsko-Stadlmayer, Pere Pastor Vilanova, Jolien Schukking, Ana
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630JUD002352414
30 juin 2020
/14) against the Republic of Moldova lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Moldovan national, Ms Ana
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0225DEC002226622
25 février 2025
European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 25 February 2025 as a Chamber composed of: Jolien Schukking , President , Lado Chanturia, Faris Vehabović, Ana
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0228JUD001416619
28 février 2023
The applicant submitted that the court had interpreted the law erroneously, in so far as the meaning of “as a result of certain legal provisions” (see paragraph 19 below) could not be limited to
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0927JUD007266301
27 septembre 2007
D'après le certificat établi, le requérant présentait plusieurs éraflures et hématomes sur les tempes, le cou, l'épaule gauche et le dos, ainsi qu'une fissure anale d'un centimètre et demi de long et d'une
Pôle 4 - Chambre 11
644229e4d2fa6fd0f804043c
20 avril 2023
, les Docteurs [Z] et [W] indiquent dans leur rapport en date du 23 janvier 2018 que Mme [X] [U] a présenté à la suite de l'accident du 31 juillet 2015 un grave traumatisme crânien avec hémorragie méningée
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0527JUD003932602
27 mai 2010
Moreover, the Court finds that this part of the application is not manifestly ill ‑ founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104JUD002269503
4 novembre 2008
The Court notes that the application is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0830DEC003733408
30 août 2011
The Court of Appeal held that the offence under section 5 of the 2003 Act was committed by a person having vaginal, anal or oral sexual intercourse with a victim under 13, whether or not
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1006DEC000819602
6 octobre 2005
It remained the case that body searches - including anal inspections - were performed on each prisoner at least once a week [13] , a process which was invariably perceived as humiliating.