AHMAD against Greece and Sweden The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 22   September 2015 as a Committee composed of:   Khanlar Hajiyev, President,   Linos-Alexandre

Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Egbert Myjer,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

tribunal judiciaire de Dunkerque APPELANTE La SARL Hugo Menuiseries prise la personne de ses représentants légaux ayant son siège social [Adresse 5] [Localité 3] représentée par Me Alexandre

DEFENDEURS Société VEOLIA EAU - COMPAGNIE GENERALE DES EAUX, SCA immatriculée au RCS de PARIS sous le n° 572 025 526, dont le siège social est sis [Adresse 11] - [Localité 23] représentée par Me Julien LAMPE

______ N° RG 24/00444 - N° Portalis DB3Q-W-B7I-QBFT PRONONCÉE PAR Virginie BOUREL, Vice-Présidente, Assistée de Fabien DUPLOUY, greffier,lors des débats à l’audience du 13 septembre 2024 et de Alexandre

    The applicant, Mr Alexander Sokolov, is a Russian national, who was born in 1960 and lives in Voronezh, Russian Federation. He was represented before the Court by Mr E.

   The present Report concerns Application No. 20114/92 by Alexander Kovar against Austria, introduced on 25 May 1992 and registered on 12 June 1992.   2.

xa0;      Application No. 19006/91                       by Hendrik Alexander

The applicants were represented before the Court by Ms   Natalia Mardari, a lawyer practising in Chişinău.

    The applicant was represented by Mr Stefan Vnuk, a lawyer practising in Harrow.

According to the applicant, he retained another lawyer, Ms A., immediately before the appeal hearing.

The applicant, who had been in pre-trial detention since 7   April 2006, was represented by a lawyer in the proceedings. 7.

DI SIVIERO ALESSANDRA & C. v.

Kolář, a lawyer practising in Děčín. The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr V.A. Schorm, Ministry of Justice.

  Volná, a lawyer practising in Brno. The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Vít A. Schorm, of the Ministry of Justice. 2.

Smetana, a   lawyer practising in Brno. The respondent Government were represented by their Agent, Mr V. A. Schorm. A.

Křápková, a lawyer practising in Brno. The Czech Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr Vít A. Schorm, of the Ministry of Justice. 2.

The applicant, represented by a lawyer of his choice, made no claim in respect of expenses incurred before the Court. 43.

The remaining part of the letter repeated the content of the letter sent to the lawyer on 20 April 2009. 41.     On 23 June 2009 the lawyer arrived at the medical colony.