CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0118JUD003506203
18 janvier 2007
The applicant and N. had possessed a share in the cooperative. The City Court considered the sum they had paid for the share as a part of the joint property. 8.
Page 33 sur 238
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0509JUD003117219
9 mai 2023
[That] would also run counter to the aim of Jehovah’s Witnesses, who want[ed] to share the message of the Gospel in a peaceful, respectful and orderly manner (Article 9 of the [Convention]).” 13
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-156172
18 juin 2015
In 2007 the B.Bank showed its interest in taking over the H.Bank by buying a certain amount of its shares.
ECLI:CEDH:001-156168
ECLI:CEDH:001-156173
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1179565-1224485
9 novembre 2004
He also kept sheep and goats. The facts are disputed by the parties.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1203DEC003366796
3 décembre 1997
They found that the property concerned had not been expropriated by the State within the meaning of this Act, but by Section 2(5) of Presidential Decree No. 108/1945.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0611JUD005515916
11 juin 2024
shall: [...] c) transfer active ownership of the shares or capital that he/she owns to another person... 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1969:1215DEC000356668
15 décembre 1969
that the purpose stated by the applicant should be noted down on each sheet before handing it over to him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0626JUD001064005
26 juin 2018
He also sought the return of the Kryvorizhstal shares to the Fund, and asked the court to seize the shares as a temporary measure until the dispute was finally resolved. 45.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0311DEC006886401
11 mars 2004
The heirs may, however, avoid such a claim by granting the applicant a share equal to that which he or she would have received but for the application of Articles 759 and 760.”
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-222202
8 décembre 2022
Resolution CM/ResDH(2022)358 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Two cases against Ukraine (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 December 2022 at the 1451 st meeting
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1016DEC003888406
16 octobre 2008
With regard to the fourth applicant they claimed that she did not have any personal interest in the outcome of the proceedings as she had taken part only in her capacity as an administrator of the estate
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0214DEC002305503
14 février 2006
At no time has the applicant owned any shares in the Company, and this fact is not disputed by the parties.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708JUD001627613
8 juillet 2025
or to perform other acts aimed at the separate alienation of their respective shares.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD003677206
20 septembre 2011
She submitted she had suffered anxiety and frustration over an extended period of time. 46. The Government contested these claims as excessive and speculative.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0911DEC002791795
11 septembre 1997
The latter argument applies with all the more force as the applicant has not shown that the value of his shares diminished.
ECLI:CEDH:001-116292
11 janvier 2013
and declared void changes made during that meeting as regards the appointment of the supervisory board members.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0711DEC004877899
11 juillet 2000
On 13 November 1994 the applicants’ garage as well as the adjacent storage room and a meat curing-shed in Bjelovar were destroyed, also as a result of an explosion.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0411DEC001085721
11 avril 2023
All shares are held by KSBG mbH & Co. KG, a consortium of several public utility companies.