Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1119JUD002835711
19 novembre 2013
19 novembre 2013
A judge may not abstain from voting (Rule 41).
Source officielleciv2
6079432b9ba5988459c41538
17 janvier 1974
17 janvier 1974
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : ATTENDU, SELON L'ARRET INFIRMATIF ATTAQUE, QU'A LA SUITE D'UN ACCIDENT AU COURS DUQUEL ANGE RUDAS FUT BLESSE ET DONT LE MINEUR CARMELO X...
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0402JUD002150393
2 avril 1997
2 avril 1997
case before the Court (Rule 3 para. 1 of the Addendum to Rules of Court A), stated that he wished to take part in the proceedings and designated the lawyer who would represent him (Rule 30).
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2503
11 septembre 2007
11 septembre 2007
He alleged that he had not received appropriate medical care since his arrest and requested that the Government, under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, provide him with treatment appropriate to his condition
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0113DEC001841891
13 janvier 1992
13 janvier 1992
PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION On 3 April 1991 the applicants requested the Commission to apply Rule 36 of its Rules of Procedure in their case.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0913DEC000960509
13 septembre 2016
13 septembre 2016
By a letter of 17 October 2014 the applicant’s representative was informed that the President of the Section had decided, pursuant to Rule 38 § 1 of the Rules of Court, to admit his belated
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2077
15 mai 2012
15 mai 2012
Law – Article 35 § 1: Even an application containing all the data and documents required by Rule 47 § 1 of the Rules of Court could not continue to be considered to have been introduced at a particular
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231521
9 février 2024
9 février 2024
On 28 July 2023, the Court applied an interim measure in the case under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, indicating to the respondent Government “to place the applicant with no further delay
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0506DEC001446903
6 mai 2004
6 mai 2004
On 29 May 2003 the Court decided, under Rule 54 § 2 (b) of the Rules of Court, to give notice of the application to the respondent Government and invite them to submit written observations on the
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0402DEC003659506
2 avril 2013
2 avril 2013
36 § 3 of the Rules of the Court).
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615DEC005887709
15 juin 2010
15 juin 2010
At the same time, a number of questions were put to the Government of Greece under Rule 54 § 2 (a) of the Rules of Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112DEC002948107
12 janvier 2010
12 janvier 2010
THE LAW Under Rule 47 § 6 of the Rules of Court, applicants have a duty to keep the Court informed of any change of address.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-230941
9 janvier 2024
9 janvier 2024
On 28 July 2023, under Rule 39 of the Rules of the Court, the Court indicated to the respondent Government “to place the applicant with no further delay in a REMS or elsewhere where adequate treatment
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1106DEC003420207
6 novembre 2007
6 novembre 2007
Dollé , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 9 August 2007, Having regard to the decision to apply Rule 40 of the Rules of Court to the above application, Having regard
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531DEC001167315
31 mai 2016
31 mai 2016
On 11 March 2015 an interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court was indicated to the Government preventing the applicant’s removal to Uzbekistan. 5.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0718JUD003432096
18 juillet 2002
18 juillet 2002
The application was allocated to the Third Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1559
28 avril 2009
28 avril 2009
The issue of the normative scope of the Rules of the Chamber of Deputies was examined by the domestic courts, which found that any Rules concerning the Chamber of Deputies derived from the Constitution
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0919JUD004336298
19 septembre 2000
19 septembre 2000
The application was allocated to the First Section of the Court (Rule 52 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-161592
23 février 2016
23 février 2016
They are required to respect the rules provided for in the acts adopted by the bodies of the [KFM].
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218DEC001395012
18 février 2014
18 février 2014
Application of Rule 43 § 4 of the Rules of Court 28.
Source officiellePage 33 sur 2215
SARL DE RULAN
29/05/2026
Voir →
SARL DE RULAN
19/04/2026
Voir →
AUDIT VERGES RULAND
13/11/2025
Voir →
RULAND, Marie-Paule
21/10/2025
Voir →
Rulaafoo
17/10/2025
Voir →