Elle m'a répondu: « et elles ne lui ont pas vidé ' Il fallait lui vider pff ! ». Elle donne le traitement à la place des vétérinaires.

constater qu'aucun argument ne peut être tiré de la première conversation en raison de son caractère peu clair dès lors qu'elle est essentiellement constituée d'onomatopées (euh-bah-bon-ben-ouais-humm-pff

  62435/00, §§ 24-29, ECHR 2003 ‑ VII; Pfeifer and Plankl v. Austria , judgment of 25   February 1992, Series A no. 227, p. 16, § 36; and Oberschlick v.

Court H.R., Poitrimol judgment of 23 November 1993, Series A no. 277, p. 13 et seq., para. 31; Pfeiffer and Plankl judgment of 25 February 1992, Series A no. 227, p. 16 et seq., para. 37).

France , no. 64915/01, § 70, ECHR   2004-VI; Pfeifer v. Austria , no. 12556/03, § 35, 15 November 2007; and Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v.

France , n o 64915/01, § 52, CEDH 2004 ‑ VI ; et Pfeifer c.

il ne soit pas expressément garanti par la Convention, le droit à la réputation fait partie de la notion de «   vie privée   » inscrite à l’article 8 de la Convention (voir, entre autres, Pfeifer

Court recalls that it has already been accepted that a person’s right to protection of his or her reputation is encompassed by Article 8 as being part of the right to respect for private life (see Pfeifer

France , no. 64915/01, § 70, ECHR 2004-VI; Pfeifer v. Austria , no. 12556/03, § 35, 15 November 2007; Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v.

proceedings may be affected by the fact that an undercover agent of the police authorities played an important part in bringing about the offence which is the basis of the criminal charge (Radermacher and Pferrer

Court H.R., Pfeifer and Plankl judgment of 25 February 1992, Series A no. 227, p. 16, para. 37).

    The Court reiterates at the outset that “private life” extends to aspects relating to personal identity and reputation (see Pfeifer v.   Austria , no.

falsity’s potential to have a “chilling effect” on the press, its use in this context aims to protect a claimant’s right to protection of his reputation as guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention ( Pfeifer

CAO,   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   15031/20 12/03/2020 Cheslav Yezhiyevich PFEYFFER

distante' [W] [I], 9h57: 'ouai tu es seule' 9h58 : 'oui mais [U] est porte ouverte' [W] [I], 9h58: 'zut...' 9h58 : 'yep' [W] [I], 9h58:'tu veux faire une 'pause' ou c'est trop'' 9h58 : 'c'est trop pfff

16/04/2025 ARRÊT N°25/263 N° RG 22/04434 - N° Portalis DBVI-V-B7G-PFEG CC/CD Décision déférée du 19 Octobre 2022 - TJ hors JAF, JEX, JLD, J.

proceedings may be affected by the fact that an undercover agent of the police authorities played an important part in bringing about the offence which is the basis of the criminal charge (Radermacher and Pferrer

France , no. 64915/01, § 70, ECHR   2004-VI; Pfeifer v. Austria , no. 12556/03, § 35, 15 November 2007; and Polanco Torres and Movilla Polanco v.

xa0; In this connection, the Court reiterates that a person’s right to the protection of his or her reputation is encompassed by Article 8 as being part of the right to respect for private life (see Pfeifer