Jebens, judges , and Mr S.

By a decision of 25 May 2004, a Supreme Court judge rejected his request. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE 12.

However, relying on the certificate by the director of the facility, issued on 28 May 2007, and by the warden reports, issued on of 29 May 2007, they contended that the conditions in the facility were

Croatia , no. 41751/02, §§ 28 and 38, 24 May 2007).

final but may be subject to editorial revision.

is final but may be subject to editorial revision.

It may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Vrbica v.

Jebens,   Mr   G. Malinverni, judges, and Mr S.

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Klein v.

Bulgaria , no. 5182/02, § 34, 22 May 2008). 42.

RUSSIA   (Application no. 12417/05)           JUDGMENT       STRASBOURG   14 May 2009   FINAL   06/11/2009   This judgment may be subject

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Kharin v.

It may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Mikheyev v.

Barbieri, Jessel, Jobert, Laurent, conseillers, M. Jariel, Mme Schmitt, M.

    On 19 March 2007 the first applicant wrote to the district prosecutor's office.

  JUDGMENT   This version was rectified on 4 February 2010 under Rule 81 of the Rules of the Court   STRASBOURG   23 July 2009   FINAL   23/10/2009   This judgment may

    The Court may only deal with the matter after all domestic remedies have been exhausted, according to the generally recognised rules of international law, and within a period of six months

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Kazmin v.

  Russia , no. 38305/02, § 27, 17 March 2005).