remained in that position.

    The applicant was born in 1947 and lives in Skopje. 5.

1939 and lives in Poland.

In its judgments nos.

In its view, the S.R.

Le TAR nota entre autres dans ses motifs que, en septembre 1996, le juge d’instance de Naples, statuant comme juge du travail, avait condamné l’université à verser à la caisse de sécurité sociale (INPS

Le TAR nota entre autres dans ses motifs que, en septembre 1996, le juge d’instance de Naples, statuant comme juge du travail, avait condamné l’université à verser à la caisse de sécurité sociale (INPS

Gürmen , a lawyer practising in Istanbul. 3.

  In the case of Gorzkowski v.

  In the case of Supergrav Albania Shpk v.

In the case of Novović v.

After noting the arguments used by the court at first ‑ instance in order to find in favour of the debtor, the appeal court stated, in particular, that: “In so far as an irrevocable decision ordered

    The applicant was born in 1953 and lives in Tirana. He was represented by Mr S. Hazizaj, a lawyer practising in Tirana. 3.

In concrete terms, this had been in 2006 (see   paragraph 8 above).

theory and in practice at the relevant time (see, inter alia , Bijelić v.

But in the present case it was not unsafe.

    The applicant, Ms Anna Michnicová, is a Slovak national who was born in 1957 and lives in Bratislava.

In 1992 the applicant inherited a 2,490 square-metre plot of land in Neugattersleben on the territory of the former German Democratic Republic (GDR) (“the property”) and was registered in the land register

Thus, in dismissing an appeal, an appellate court may, in principle, simply endorse the reasons for the lower court’s decision.