CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

50 615 résultats pour « Folzing »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0402JUD000893807

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2020

2 avril 2020

However, the following information is mentioned.

Source officielle

Page 33 sur 2531

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1016JUD003805597

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2001

16 octobre 2001

    By judgment of 28 June 1995, following adversarial proceedings in the course of which the applicant was assisted by a lawyer, the First-Instance Court acquitted the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0923DEC005584812

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2014

23 septembre 2014

Following an appeal by S., on 18 June 2009 the County Court quashed the first-instance judgment and remitted the case. 16.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0914DEC006061900

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2004

14 septembre 2004

A review to the taxpayer’s disadvantage must be made before the end of the year following the assessment year.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0626DEC004504305

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2008

26 juin 2008

Following an appeal by the applicant, on 8 March 2008 the Zagreb County Court ( Županijski sud u Zagrebu ) quashed the first-instance judgment and remitted the case.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-774984-790409

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2003

19 juin 2003

  The case has been struck out following a friendly settlement in which 80,000 euros is to be paid for any damage sustained and for costs and expenses.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0123DEC002159104

Admin. suprême

23 janvier 2018

23 janvier 2018

    The applicant complained that the Administration had been using his land without following the formal expropriation procedures and thus deprived him of his property without any compensation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-235935

Admin. suprême

26 août 2024

26 août 2024

Following an appeal by the applicant, on 1 March 2017 the Sumgayit Court of Appeal upheld his conviction, but changed the sentence to nine months’ corrective work.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155066

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2015

4 mai 2015

According to the applicant, the police officers beat him up and applied electric shocks following which he confessed to the crime. On 30 January 2010 an ambulance was called to the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-604350-609368

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2002

3 septembre 2002

    407   3.9.2002   Press release issued by the Registrar   CHAMBER JUDGMENT CONCERNING Turkey   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229636

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2023

24 novembre 2023

In 2002, following the abolition of the death penalty, the Ankara Second State Security Court commuted the sentence to aggravated life imprisonment, without the possibility of release.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68393-68861

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2001

17 mai 2001

17.5.2001   Press release issued by the Registrar   CHAMBER JUDGMENTS CONCERNING Greece, Luxembourg and Slovakia   The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing the following

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10911

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2015

15 septembre 2015

.) - 51097/13 Decision 15.9.2015 [Section V] Article 2 Positive obligations Failure to bring an action to establish State responsibility following suicide in custody: inadmissible Facts – The applicants

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-525

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2011

26 mai 2011

Indeed, the doctor had appealed following a departure from precedent favourable to him by the Court of Cassation in another case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-219395

Admin. suprême

29 août 2022

29 août 2022

In reply the MOI argued that according to an internal decision of 2011 a travel ban was an automatic measure following one’s deportation to North Macedonia.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229638

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2023

21 novembre 2023

According to the legislation at the time, even though the members of the CRC could not act as observers during their tenure, they could be relisted in the observer list following the termination of their

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243547

Admin. suprême

5 mai 2025

5 mai 2025

The following day the applicant obtained a medical report, drawn up on the basis of a medical note issued on the day of the attack and a medical check-up of the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14275

Admin. suprême

30 octobre 2023

30 octobre 2023

No. 4 Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement Article 2 para. 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom to leave a country Imposition of ban on travelling abroad for male citizens aged 18 to 60 following

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5631

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2001

26 juin 2001

Article 2-1 Life Fatal shooting by security forces and effectiveness of investigation: struck out Article 37 Article 37-1-c Continued examination not justified Unilateral declaration by Government following

Source officielle
TA

3e Section - 2e Chambre - R.222-13

DTA_2403560_20250327

Administratif

27 mars 2025

27 mars 2025

A B, représenté, en dernier lieu, par Me Foading Nchoh, demande au tribunal : 1°) de condamner l'État à lui verser la somme de 7 500 euros, en réparation des préjudices résultant de son absence de relogement

Source officielle