CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2004
29 avril 2008
As neither spouse appealed against that judgment, it became final. At a later date the applicant filed a petition for divorce with a court in his home state of Florida (USA).
Page 33 sur 1524
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113086
31 août 2009
On 25 September 2005 the applicant lodged a request to delete the conviction of Article 209 from the criminal record because Article 209 had been repealed in the meantime.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0624DEC004600499
24 juin 2003
The hearing scheduled for 8 September 1999 was adjourned because of an illness of a court expert.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0628DEC004991199
28 juin 2001
On 4 January 1999 the court adjourned a hearing because of the applicant’s illness.
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2013:C100718
3 juillet 2013
X... alias Y..., qui avait participé, le 18 septembre 1979, en tant que soliste, à une séance d'enregistrement de l'oeuvre musicale " Just because of you ", chanson destinée à intégrer la bande sonore
ECLI:CEDH:001-161642
22 février 2016
The court concluded that the applicants presented such risks because they were charged with an exceptionally serious crime and because the investigation was in its initial phase.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0618DEC002390320
18 juin 2024
In March 2023 the Supreme Court granted the applicant leave to appeal and, in a judgment of 29 November 2023, held that her human rights had been violated because Finnish legislation did
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0323DEC005417200
23 mars 2006
The applicant’s statement was the following: “I do not want to leave prison because other things are happening.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0906DEC001769602
6 septembre 2005
On 26 April 2002 the court returned the applicant’s complaint because it did not comply with the procedural requirements prescribed by law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1112DEC002459913
12 novembre 2019
this would not have allowed for any flexibility if the child was unavailable at a particular time, on account of her state of health or because of other reasons. 7 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1222JUD001498304
22 décembre 2005
Of the four hearings listed between 5 April 2000 and 28 February 2001, three hearings were adjourned because the defendants did not attend and one hearing was adjourned because the judge
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1217JUD003335396
17 décembre 2002
Preliminary objections rejected (ratione materia, victim);Violation of Art. 6-1 due to lack of fair hearing;Violation of Art. 6-1 because of right of access to court;No violation of Art. 6-1 as regards
Pôle 6 - Chambre 12
6312f07aef56904f13d44e17
2 septembre 2022
Gilles REVELLES, Conseiller Greffier : Mme Claire BECCAVIN, lors des débats ARRET : - CONTRADICTOIRE - prononcé par mise à disposition de l'arrêt au greffe de la cour, les parties en
6312f095ef56904f13d44e5d
Gilles REVELLES, Conseiller Greffier : Mme Claire BECCAVIN, lors des débats ARRET : - CONTRADICTOIRE - prononcé par mise à disposition de l'arrêt au greffe de la cour, les parties en ayant
6360ca893c369c7f7499700d
28 octobre 2022
Raoul CARBONARO, Président de chambre Greffier : Mme Claire BECCAVIN, lors des débats ARRET : - CONTRADICTOIRE - prononcé par mise à disposition de l'arrêt au greffe de la cour, les parties
6360ca8a3c369c7f74997017
Gilles BUFFET, Conseiller Greffier : Mme Claire BECCAVIN, lors des débats ARRET : -CONTRADICTOIRE - prononcé par mise à disposition de l'arrêt au greffe de la cour, les parties en ayant
634113e058bc223e2e3f0987
7 octobre 2022
ECLI:CEDH:001-218714
4 juillet 2022
The applicants participated in both civil and the ensuing enforcement proceedings as interested third parties on the side of the municipality because the road in question enabled them to access their properties
ECLI:CEDH:001-237740
27 septembre 2024
He submitted, among other things, that he had previously been imprisoned in Syria because of his oppositional activities; that he was still of interest to the Syrian authorities; and that he had been called
ECLI:CEDH:001-221851
22 novembre 2022
2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the decision of the domestic courts to declare inadmissible the applicant’s civil action to have certain material defects of her flat remedied because