Concerning the criminal proceedings against the first applicant all three applicants make several complaints.

Subsequently, they claimed that the investigator dealing with their son’s criminal case should also be prosecuted.

  Additional relevant Council of Europe documents have also been translated, published and distributed to all members of the police.

    All the applicants brought a cassation appeal before the Supreme Court.

That being so, those agreements were also void ab initio , which entailed the extinguishment of all possible legal consequences relating to the conclusion of the defective agreements, pursuant to Article

political stakeholders are fully committed to finding an appropriate solution for the execution of this judgment;   Recalling also that the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina provides that “The

All bodies bore multiple gunshot and stab wounds. There was also bruising and, in some cases, broken bones and mutiliation. The applicants brought the bodies back to Ingushetia for burial.

They all had visible injuries. Soon afterwards, nearby, the police found and arrested another man, S.K., who had also been involved in the conflict. 8.

They also referred to the witness statements; in all, statements of forty-one witnesses are mentioned in the County Court’s judgment.

All   the   soldiers and staff of the military unit were also questioned immediately.

It was accompanied by two other vehicles, an Ural truck and an UAZ all-terrain vehicle.

account of their conviction to imprisonment for defamation as well as of arbitrary application of anti-terrorism legislation (violations of Article 10);   Noting further that the Fatullayev case also

  The applicant further complains that, following his arrest on 22 April 1997, all business records connected with “Paramount Portugal - Consultadoria Comercial Lda.” were seized and all its assets

(See also Varvara v.

  The judge stated "the judge was right to hold that this was a case of all or nothing.

The area between the military positions was also mined.

He also requested that N.C. be subjected to a lie detector machine examination. The applicant also requested the questioning of A.G.

He was also ordered to be deported from Denmark with a lifelong ban on re ‑ entry. 4.     The applicant was deported on 23 December 2022. 5.

She also referred to Article   8 of the Convention and the permissible limitations contained therein. 14.