CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

4 744 résultats pour « Sher MESSINGER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0719JUD007144001

Admin. suprême

19 juillet 2007

19 juillet 2007

    On 1 and 2 December 1997, respectively, the shareholder's meetings approved the merging of the target company into the E-Versicherungsgruppe AG (the “acquiring company”), which was seated

Page 32 sur 238

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1969:1110JUD000217864

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 1969

10 novembre 1969

On 26 September 1968, the Court held a brief meeting in Strasbourg to prepare the oral part of the procedure. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113572

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2012

11 septembre 2012

    The summons begged the question which party had control of the shares and voting rights in I. B.V., M. B.V. and W. B.V.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0528JUD002618714

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2026

28 mai 2026

of the proceeds of the offence could be identified – confiscation should be limited to the amount of the individuals’ shares.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0207JUD005470012

Admin. suprême

7 février 2017

7 février 2017

    On 3 December 1994 the applicant joined the GSK and paid his share for a garage (6,500 United States dollars (USD) at the material time). 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0315DEC003051796

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2001

15 mars 2001

Different points have been raised concerning the meaning of the rise in the retirement age from 52 to 60 years.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0616DEC000772012

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2020

16 juin 2020

The meeting was secretly recorded based on a prior judicial warrant. The individuals present at the meeting all discussed the arrangements of a deal, with V.Kh. translating for the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328JUD004502807

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2017

28 mars 2017

She had then kissed him to calm him down and offered to have sexual intercourse, which he had rejected as she was menstruating. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-123864

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2013

9 juillet 2013

shouted by the group such as “Our leader is İbrahim; İbrahim, Deniz, Mahir”, “Our struggle continues and shall continue”, “İbrahim Kaypakkaya is immortal”, “We will drown fascism in the blood it has shed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245449

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2025

19 septembre 2025

According to the applicant, he published a video on a social network on 5   February 2019, calling on international and local NGOs to shed light on the alleged ill-treatment of certain members of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922DEC003523306

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2009

22 septembre 2009

4,373.91 Ukrainian hryvnias (about 948.01 euros at the material time) to be paid by his former employer, the JSC “Slovyansky Keramichny Kombinat” in which the respondent State owns more than 25% of the share

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7408

Admin. suprême

19 février 2013

19 février 2013

Decision 19.2.2013 [Section V] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom to impart information Freedom to receive information Conviction and order to pay damages for operating website allowing third parties to share

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110DEC003298709

Admin. suprême

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

Articles   6   §   1 and 13 of the Convention about the unreasonable length of proceedings before commercial courts in connection with a dispute concerning consolidation of two ordinary shares

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1215DEC000300706

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2009

15 décembre 2009

(by Ms Valdron) showing a sheep and bearing the following inscriptions in English: “Hello, Holy!

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0226DEC004916916

Admin. suprême

26 février 2019

26 février 2019

In the evening of that day, a shell exploded in the yard of his house. The windows and roof of the house were damaged. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0718JUD004010903

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2006

18 juillet 2006

Furthermore, it fixed the parties’ respective shares of the property. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1215DEC002834518

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2020

15 décembre 2020

The applicant signed the minutes to confirm that he had taken part in the meeting and agreed with the decision. 8 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1218JUD000373802

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2007

18 décembre 2007

The parties would each hold 50% of the shares. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0206JUD005069320

Admin. suprême

6 février 2024

6 février 2024

    The case concerns an imposed lease as a result of the application of Chapter 69 of the Laws of Malta whereby the applicants, who co-own the property at different shares, are receiving 203

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1120JUD002793505

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2007

20 novembre 2007

at issue could not be deemed a “public gathering” within the meaning of the Serbian Criminal Code.

Source officielle