the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in its well-established case-law (see, among other numerous authorities, Karelin

  72051/17, §§   34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia , no.

Russia , nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 121-22, 10 April 2018; Karelin v. Russia , no.   926/08, § 84, 20 September 2016; and Kasparov v. Russia, no. 53659/07, § 69, 11 October 2016.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

Their submissions in that respect were similar to those made in Karelin v. Russia (no. 926/08, §§ 45-48, 20 September 2016). 2.     The Court’s assessment 35.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

Russia , no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to administrative escorting to and detention in a police station beyond three hours without any justification; Karelin v.

Russia [Committee], no. 10970/12, 12 February 2019, about inadequate redress for unlawful deprivation of liberty in the context of administrative-offence prosecution for participation in public events; Karelin

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport and in respect of permanent video surveillance in detention facilities 1,000   181/22 27/01/2022 Pavel Vyacheslavovich KARELIN

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013),   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings (see Karelin v.

  72051/17, §§   34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

  72051/17, §§   34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

Russia , no. 41461/10, §§   101 ‑ 11, 27   November 2012, concerning excessive length of pre-trial detention, Karelin v.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

there been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, in all cases except the cases of Mr Poputnikov and Mr Bychkov, on account of the absence of the prosecuting party from the proceedings (see Karelin

Russia, [GC], no. 5826/03, 22 May 2012, about delays in examination of the complaints against detention orders; Karelin v.