The applicants   The cases concern applications lodged by four German nationals, Fritz Streletz, Heinz Kessler,   K.-H. W. and Egon Krenz, who live in Berlin.

Germany - 35023/04 Judgment 8.12.2011 [Section V] Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Deprivation of property Loss of shares in land without full compensation in context of German

normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial }  THE FACTS   Whereas the facts presented by the applicant may be summarised as follows:   The applicant is a German

The German bank was thus protected from any financial risk.

of the two German States.

Article 6, paragraph 1, of the Convention; - held that the government of the respondent state was to pay the applicant, within three months from the date at which the judgment became final, 10 000 German

against Germany, lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 2 March 1994 under former Article 25 of the Convention by Ms Margit Jakobs, born Janssen, Roswitha and Ms Melanie Janssen, three German

Wirges, a German national living in Hamburg, who is the managing director of the second applicant, the Quicknaut GmbH, a limited liability company possessing legal personality under German law.

From May 1943 until May 1945 he was forced to work without pay for the German State as part of the forced labour scheme.

War, and confiscation of their property without compensation: inadmissible   The applicants are 90 persons of German ethnic origin.

His call-up in the German army as a lieutenant on the reserve list was revoked on account of his membership in the above party.

The applicants in application nos. 26366/24 and 30210/24, both German nationals, had been granted temporary residence in Croatia in July 2021.

W. was a soldier of the NVA, the army of the former GDR, who was stationed on the border between the two German States.

In conclusion, the seriousness of the offences committed by the applicant and their violent and repeated nature warranted the conclusion that the German authorities had put forward sufficiently strong

possessions Non-enforcement of a final judgment ordering annulment of a joint venture contract creating an airline company, and reimbursement of investments made: admissible   The applicant, a German

font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 4 December 2018   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 12380/18 TRADE UNION OF GERMAN

Following the outbreak of the Second World War, in the autumn of 1939 the property was taken over by the German occupying administration.

After German reunification, the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) succeeded to that treaty pursuant to Article 12 of the German Unification Treaty ( Einigungsvertrag ) in conjunction with the proclamation

La présidente du tribunal a désigné Mme Geismar, première conseillère, en application de l’article R. 222-13 du code de justice administrative.

Lacaïle, premier conseiller, Mme Geismar, première conseillère. Rendu public par mise à disposition au greffe le 13 juillet 2022. La rapporteure, Signé M.