CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD000433606
16 février 2021
According to the applicant, on the night of 23 January 2003 the officers had again beaten him, forcing him to confess. 34 .
Page 32 sur 2531
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0703JUD002815022
3 juillet 2025
She initially froze but later tried to repel him from forcing oral sex by moving her head and she later tried to stop him from forcing vaginal penetration by scratching and biting him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1029JUD002080610
29 octobre 2015
; - Ku said, “A man was following four unfamiliar police officers.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0925DEC002878204
25 septembre 2007
Due to L.’s age and her adolescence, forcing her to see her father at the moment would endanger her well-being.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0916JUD000041203
16 septembre 2010
The applicants submitted the following arguments in support of their claims. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1222JUD002318802
22 décembre 2005
Berger , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 1 December 2005, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5980
20 juillet 2000
Following his conviction in 1991 for drug trafficking, an order excluding him from French territory was made.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2775975-3052939
2 juillet 2009
At the relevant time he was following a course of treatment for his drug addiction.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0110JUD002396002
10 janvier 2008
Steiner, Khanlar Hajiyev, Dean Spielmann, Sverre Erik Jebens, judges, and André Wampach, Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 6 December 2007, Delivers the following
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-52202
14 février 2001
R (2000) 2 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the re-examination or reopening of certain cases at domestic level following judgments of the European Court of Human Rights; Considering that
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0923JUD007509801
23 septembre 2003
Subsequently, the court held hearings on the following dates: 11 July 1994 and 14 February 1995. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0525JUD001161285
25 mai 1989
Article 43 (art. 43) of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") and the relevant provisions of the Rules of Court, as a Chamber composed of the following
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1221JUD002591406
21 décembre 2010
On 28 December 1999, following the completion of the pre-trial investigations, the case was referred to the Tsentralnyy District Court of Simferopol, which on 4 May 2000 remitted the case
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1008REP001146485
8 octobre 1987
Following an exchange of letters channelled through the Commission the Agent of the Government, by letter of 14 September 1987, submitted on behalf of the parties the following text dated 25 August 1987
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-99624
3 juin 2010
On 23/11/2010, following referral of the issue, the Supreme Court held that sections 22(3) and 25(1) complied with the Constitution and the European Convention.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177140
29 août 2017
On 3 August 2016 the Oost-Brabant Regional Court, following a hearing in camera, dismissed the request.
ECLI:CEDH:001-170118
28 novembre 2016
Following the lack of jurisdiction decision of the Ergani Assize Court, the file was sent to the Diyarbakır Assize Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0325JUD000048509
25 mars 2010
The proceedings before the Hanover Regional Court following the first remittal 18.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0220JUD004209102
20 février 2007
Early , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 30 January 2007, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0701JUD001921891
1 juillet 1997
Deprivation of liberty following the arrest 20.