CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

24 730 résultats pour « Farissy »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1112JUD001417123

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2024

12 novembre 2024

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life ... 2.

Source officielle

Page 32 sur 1237

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10136

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2014

23 octobre 2014

Russia - 61362/12 Judgment 23.10.2014 [Section I] Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8-1 Respect for family life Failure to enforce residence order concerning child abducted by his mother: violation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10151

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2014

3 octobre 2014

As to the existence of exceptional circumstances, all the members of the applicant’s family were Dutch nationals entitled to enjoy family life with each other in the Netherlands.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0919JUD005882812

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2024

19 septembre 2024

The authorities refused the request, finding that the first applicant could not be insured as the second applicant’s family member because this was not allowed for by law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7512

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2013

14 mars 2013

Germany - 18734/09 and 9424/11 Judgment 14.3.2013 [Section V] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Withdrawal of parental authority solely on strength of children’s uncorroborated allegations

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1222JUD000632515

Admin. suprême

22 décembre 2020

22 décembre 2020

    Effective protection against expulsion of family members “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0227JUD007803014

Admin. suprême

27 février 2025

27 février 2025

The Court reiterates that the need to apply to the domestic courts for protection of their couple’s ordinary needs is in itself an obstacle to respect for their private and family life. 21.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1112JUD000958821

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2024

12 novembre 2024

However, the family life of [the applicant] and his Danish girlfriend has been of a fairly short duration, and their children are quite young, so physical separation from their father for a period of time

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0905JUD003574021

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2023

5 septembre 2023

According to the information received, he has no close family members in Iraq, and he does not have contact with any distant family members in Iraq.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0409JUD005130122

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2024

9 avril 2024

She has family living in Thailand and has a house belonging to her ex-husband at her disposal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-110

Admin. suprême

21 février 2012

21 février 2012

Romania - 16965/10 Judgment 21.2.2012 [Section III] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for family life Insufficiently thorough analysis of best interests of child and unfairness of decision-making process in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0618JUD004314008

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2019

18 juin 2019

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life)

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0326JUD005543109

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2020

26 mars 2020

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 - Positive obligations;Article 8-1 - Respect for family life;Respect for private life)

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD001873409

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2013

14 mars 2013

It was thus observed that the children’s family closely supervised the girl via her mobile phone.

Source officielle
CA

Chambre Civile

67908b344143037ceabfbfdd

Appel

21 janvier 2025

21 janvier 2025

FARISA SARL agissant poursuites et diligences de son représentant légal domicilié en cette qualité au siège social [Adresse 3] [Localité 7] représentée par Me François-Xavier PELLETIER, avocat au

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1012DEC001954492

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 1994

12 octobre 1994

His family links did not outweigh the public interest in imposing his deportation. Furthermore, his family could be expected to follow him to Turkey in order to maintain family contacts with him.

Source officielle
CC

ordo

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2023:OR60645

Cassation

13 avril 2023

13 avril 2023

Pourvoi n° : F 23-11.459 Demandeur(s) : l'établissement public d'aménagement Euroméditerranée Avocat(s) : la SCP Nicolaÿ, de Lanouvelle Défendeur(s) : la société Etablissements Farsy

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1119JUD001369305

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2009

19 novembre 2009

Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1238

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2009

24 novembre 2009

Furthermore, the Court attached considerable importance to the solidity of the applicant’s family ties in the United Kingdom and the difficulties his family would face if they were to return to Nigeria

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120JUD002858603

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2009

20 janvier 2009

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle