CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1095
31 août 2010
Their request had been aimed at establishing a legal parent-child relationship between the first applicant and the child, while retaining the original parent-child relationship, and its essential purpose
Page 32 sur 385
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-161933
14 mars 2016
In 2007 Ms N.R. lodged an action seeking the modification of the applicant’s access rights and the increase of the amount of the child allowance.
ECLI:CEDH:002-6185
16 novembre 1999
The child, who was ill, had to be admitted to hospital on arrival in Italy.
ECLI:CEDH:001-204972
7 septembre 2020
has sole custody of the child.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0618JUD002877512
18 juin 2013
On 2 April 2006 a couple was chosen as foster parents for the child.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0603DEC005711610
3 juin 2014
right [to receive] child allowance until the child attains the age of three.”
ECLI:CEDH:002-438
26 juillet 2011
Abduction, in March 2008 the applicant brought an action against the mother in a Hungarian court for the return of the child.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10296
11 décembre 2014
Two years later the wife started divorce proceedings and both she and the first applicant sought custody of the child.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0222DEC002504794
22 février 1995
Further visits of the child born in 1985 took place until August 1991.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0906DEC002460494
6 septembre 1995
However, ceasing access would end the distress caused to the child by the applicant's use of the child in his attempts to have her live with him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530JUD003864709
30 mai 2017
In a counterclaim the applicant requested that the child be placed in his custody. 12. The applicant also filed a criminal complaint against Ms N.R. alleging child endangerment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0406DEC002292093
6 avril 1994
by the interests of the child not to be disturbed in its present status and position as child in the family of Mrs F and her husband.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0724JUD002561212
24 juillet 2018
child stay overnight with him and her restriction on the amount of time which the applicant could spend with the child.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002JUD005698715
2 octobre 2018
Moreover, he had demonstrated no interest in the child, either before her birth or afterwards; he had lodged a claim to establish his paternity in respect of the child only a year after the child had been
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1213JUD003905103
13 décembre 2007
child could keep her name.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113DEC006509209
13 novembre 2012
Proceedings concerning the change of placement of the youngest child 24. On 22 June 2009 the child welfare authorities decided to change the placement of the youngest child.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD004135410
The Khimki Town Child Welfare Authority (“the Khimki child welfare authority”) delivered a report stating that it was in the best interests of the child to stay with the applicant, while the Moscow Kuzminki
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0330JUD006488619
30 mars 2023
Enforcement of the order to return the child 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927JUD002903204
27 septembre 2011
A.C., the couple’s only child, was born on 7 August 1994. 10.
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2024:C100235
15 mai 2024
Mme [M], le 18 janvier 2017, a réservé auprès de la société Blue Passion une croisière « Chili, Nouvelle Zélande, Australie » sur un navire appartenant à la société de droit italien Costa Crociere, devant