He could not be blamed for amending his claims because he had been forced to do so due to his dismissal and a change in the employer’s legal status. 36.

The applicant furthermore contended that he could not have been blamed for not providing the original of the power of attorney, which he submitted was a fake document. 15.

He could not be blamed for amending his claims because he was compelled to do so due to frequent legislative changes. 2.     The Court’s assessment 37.

Given that the applicants’ requests were made in the context of forthcoming parliamentary elections, such a blanket refusal can hardly be reconciled with the importance for local voters to have information

    Furthermore, the present case was distinguishable from that of Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas , cited above.

journalists is subject to the proviso that they act in good faith in order to provide accurate and reliable information in accordance with the tenets of responsible journalism (see, mutatis mutandis , Bladet

Thus, the contents of the impugned articles cannot be looked at in isolation from the controversy (see Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no.

interest is subject to the proviso that they are acting in good faith in order to provide accurate and reliable information in accordance with the ethics of journalism (see, among other authorities, Bladet

Belgium , 24   February   1997, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 ‑ I; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no.   21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III).

  Belgium , judgment of 24   February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 ‑ I, pp. 233-34, § 37, and the Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas judgment cited above, § 59).

proper administration of justice, its duty is nevertheless to impart – in a manner consistent with its obligations and responsibilities – information and ideas on all matters of public interest (see Bladet

Belgium , 24   February 1997, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 ‑ I; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III).

proper administration of justice, its duty is nevertheless to impart – in a manner consistent with its obligations and responsibilities – information and ideas on all matters of public interest (see Bladet

proper administration of justice, its duty is nevertheless to impart – in a manner consistent with its obligations and responsibilities – information and ideas on all matters of public interest (see Bladet

She referred to Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway ([GC] no. 21980/93, ECHR 1999 ‑ III); Colombani and Others v. France (no.

These factors, in turn, require consideration of other elements such as the authority of the source ( Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas , cited above), whether the newspaper had conducted a reasonable amount

Belgium , 24   February 1997, § 37, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997 ‑ I; and Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III).

In assessing whether such a need exists and what measures should be adopted to deal with it, the national authorities are left a certain margin of appreciation (see Bladet   Tromsø and Stensaas v.

As a result, inmates had to share beds or sleep on mattresses (and some just on blankets) placed on the floor.