Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-148131
23 octobre 2014
23 octobre 2014
It was held by the Regional Court that there were no reasons to mitigate the sentence, because the applicant had not suffered any concrete disadvantage as a result of that period having been exceeded.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-162966
19 avril 2016
19 avril 2016
On 26 June 2012 the applicant was detained in Gherla Prison because he was suspected of attempted murder.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-165039
24 juin 2016
24 juin 2016
The court found that because of the applicant’s inactivity, her property rights had not been restored.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248402
8 janvier 2026
8 janvier 2026
It held that the procedural law did not allow it to go into the merits because a cross-appeal seeking a different, favourable outcome on other grounds was missing.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1023DEC007044601
23 octobre 2003
23 octobre 2003
On 19 September 2001 the Constitutional Court declared the complaint inadmissible because it was not filed against a final decision.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0831DEC003286503
31 août 2004
31 août 2004
He claimed to be harassed in the DRC because of his political activities.
Source officielle8ème chambre
DTA_2204001_20221202
2 décembre 2022
2 décembre 2022
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire enregistrés le 29 mars 2022 et le 21 octobre 2022, Mme D A, agissant en son nom et au nom des enfants C A, E A et F A, représentée par Me Béchaux
Source officielle9ème chambre
DTA_2314608_20241118
18 novembre 2024
18 novembre 2024
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 28 septembre 2023, Mme C B, en son nom propre et en qualité de représentante légale de E D, représentée par Me Bechaux, demande au tribunal
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113DEC000964906
13 novembre 2008
13 novembre 2008
The applicant had not been a victim of the alleged violation, because the judgments had been not in his favour but in favour of Saturn.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155549
29 mai 2015
29 mai 2015
Eingetragene Partnerschaft ‑ Gesetz ) did not correspond to their idea of an institutionalised partnership as it was in many ways lighter ( lockerer ) than a traditional civil marriage, and because
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1213JUD003382004
13 décembre 2007
13 décembre 2007
From 11 May to 31 October 2001 no hearings were scheduled, because the case was being transferred to another judge. 21.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD001360105
19 février 2013
19 février 2013
12 February 2004 the hearing was adjourned because both parties failed to appear. 16. On 29 March 2004 the hearing was cancelled because the judge was ill. 17.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1208JUD004465406
8 décembre 2011
8 décembre 2011
In particular, the hearings were adjourned twice because of the failure of the applicant to appear, twenty times due to the failure of the respondents or their representatives to appear, and twice because
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1202JUD004213802
2 décembre 2004
2 décembre 2004
Two hearings did not take place because both parties did not appear. Three judges in succession dealt with the case.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0519JUD005828219
19 mai 2022
19 mai 2022
In July 2017 the charges against K.P. were dismissed because she had fulfilled the aforementioned conditions. 3 .
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0618JUD000445709
18 juin 2019
18 juin 2019
S., a victim, also submitted an extraordinary appeal, arguing that the proceedings had been unfair because she had also not been summoned and that because the applicant had been convicted unfairly because
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0509JUD003665805
9 mai 2017
9 mai 2017
They had decided to search her bag because such an action “was compatible with the law”.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0322JUD001935509
22 mars 2022
22 mars 2022
Because Pte Ye.F. had testified against Pte K., attitude of his fellow servicemen towards him grew worse. 6 .
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327DEC003791305
27 mars 2008
27 mars 2008
However, he claimed that he had been insulted and then dismissed because of his Hutu ethnicity.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1926511-2023530
22 février 2007
22 février 2007
Having been told by the director of the passport department that her application could not be processed because she was not a relative of the flat-owner, Ms Tatishvili challenged the refusal before
Source officiellePage 32 sur 1499