The Court reiterates its findings in Balliu v. Albania (dec.), no.   74727/01, 30 September 2004, subsequently confirmed in the Beshiri and Others v. Albania judgment (no.

Is vise tiek siame, tiek X faktoriaus sou, matosi tendencingas teiseju noras prakisti issigimelius, nustumiant i sail talentingesnius ir tukstanti kartu geresnius balsus turincius atlikejus.

Before the Commission the applicant company is represented by Mr   Baldur   Guðlaugsson, a lawyer practising in Reykjavik.

The Court is called upon to examine whether the   proceedings in their entirety were fair (see Balliu v. Albania , no.   74727/01, § 25, 16 June 2005). 77.

part, in response to the Court’s judgments which had found that a complaint before the Constitutional Court was an effective remedy only in respect of complaints under Article 6 of the Convention (see Balliu

Albania , no. 54268/00, § 42, 18   November 2004, and Balliu v. Albania (dec.), no. 74727/01, ECHR-2004). 50.     It follows that the relevant final decision is that of 8 April 2002.

    The Court reiterates its findings in the Balliu v Albania decision (no.

The Court is called upon to examine whether the proceedings in their entirety were fair (see Balliu v. Albania , no.   74727/01, §   25, 16 June 2005). A.     Admissibility 1.

On the whole, the Court is called upon to examine whether the proceedings in their entirety were fair (see   Balliu v. Albania , no.   74727/01, §   25, 16 June 2005). A.

constitutional complaint is, in principle, an effective remedy and is thus required for exhaustion purposes in respect of an applicant’s right to a fair hearing under Article 6 of the Convention (see   Balliu

    The Court reiterates its finding in Balliu v.

Italy , judgment of 13 May 1980, §   36, Series A no. 37, and Balliu v. Albania , no. 74727/01, §§ 35-38, 16 June 2005). This was not so in the present case. 74.

The Court must however determine whether the proceedings considered as a whole, including the way in which evidence was taken, were fair as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Balliu v.

On the whole, the Court is called upon to examine whether the proceedings in their entirety were fair (see Balliu v. Albania , no.   74727/01, §   25, 16   June   2005). 101.

On the whole, the Court is called upon to examine whether proceedings in their entirety were fair (see Balliu v. Albania , no. 74727/01, § 25, 16 June 2005). 60.

Albania (dec.), no. 11186/03, 1   December 2009, and Balliu v.   Albania (dec.), no. 74727/01 , 30 September 2004). 57.

the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by ten Turkish nationals, Mr Ahmet Okyay, Ms Derya Durmaz, Mr Rıfat Bozkurt, Mr Noyan Özkan, Mr Uğur Kalelioğlu, Ms   Banu

  There appeared before the Court: (a)     for the Government Mrs   Deniz akcay ,   co - Agent , Mrs   Burçe Arı , Mrs   Işık Batmaz Keremoğlu , Mrs   Banur özaydın

Question: In an interview with Banu Güven for the television station IMC you suggested that the decision to lay down weapons could be taken at an annual congress attended by Öcalan.