Medical expertise of the applicant’s state of health was also conducted.

The Court did not consider it necessary to examine whether the impugned treatment could also be characterised as constituting “torture”.

Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its findings in Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v.

They all denied involvement in the murders.

They also alleged that they were forced under torture to sign false confessions prepared by the gendarmes.   On 22 September all 12 applicants were again medically examined.

They also relied on Articles 1 (obligation to respect human rights) and 2 § 2 (exceptions to the right to life) of the Convention.

They also relied on Articles 1 (obligation to respect human rights) and 2 § 2 (exceptions to the right to life) of the Convention.

They have also indicated that one single criterion is used nowadays for the censorship of all or parts of schoolbooks, namely if they contain elements conveying sentiments of hatred or hostility, and that

Law – Articles 3 and 8: (1) Considerations relevant to all three applications – (a) The applicable legal framework – The concept of “consent” was not explicitly referred to in the applicable provisions

This brochure was circulated to all units of the force.

They all denied having beaten the applicants. Two of them claimed that all of the applicants had sustained their injuries by falling from the wall while they had been fleeing from the prison.

Borrego Borrego, and also of Mr M.

The applicants were also all represented before the Court by Mr D.   Radin, a licensed lawyer practising in Zrenjanin.

They are all represented before the Court by Mr D. Karačić, a lawyer practising in Zagreb.

She had denied that she needed help and had refused all treatment.

(a)     ... declare an offence punishable by law all ... incitement to racial discrimination ... and also the provision of any assistance to racist activities, including the financing thereof

All applicants were ordered to pay substantial legal fees. All applicants appealed to the Court of Appeal, which held preparatory oral hearings from 14 January to 18 January 2000.

This application was also lodged in the name of all applicants in file no.   41138/98, with the exception of Lucreţia Moldovan, Bazil-Sami Lăcătuş and Adrian Moldovan.

They should also be equipped with a means of communication with prison staff.