CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

868 résultats pour « Sebastien TO »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0218JUD005010913

Admin. suprême

18 février 2016

18 février 2016

to 25/02/2013 0 year(s) and 4   month(s)   Jilava Penitentiary 11/03/2013 to 11/07/2013 0 year(s) and 4   month(s)   Jilava Penitentiary 02/08/2013 to 07/04/2014 0 year(s) and 9 &#

Page 31 sur 44

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1017DEC003664722

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2023

17 octobre 2023

    The decisions restricting the applicant’s access to his child to contact every five weeks for three hours in the presence of a custodian amounted to an interference with his right to respect

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0903DEC004878922

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2024

3 septembre 2024

They announced their presence and asked him to come out, but he had refused to comply, charged towards them with the intention of fleeing, and resisted their attempts to handcuff him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0402JUD002989516

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2026

2 avril 2026

belonged to [the applicant company].

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68186-68654

Admin. suprême

28 juillet 1999

28 juillet 1999

  33440/96), and by fifteen votes to two in the case of Di Mauro (no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0514DEC006692512

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2013

14 mai 2013

to be surrendered.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1027DEC003368996

Admin. suprême

27 octobre 1997

27 octobre 1997

to goods, facilities and services.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1104DEC002820422

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2025

4 novembre 2025

Thus, the objections to the enforcement were dismissed. 6 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0328JUD001972415

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2024

28 mars 2024

in tort was an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have the violation of the Convention acknowledged, either explicitly or in substance, and to receive

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708JUD000224619

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2025

8 juillet 2025

    According to the latest information available to the Court on 4   October 2024, it appears that the case is pending before the military prosecutor’s office attached to the High Court

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0506DEC002816707

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2014

6 mai 2014

to its integration with the divine”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0324JUD002401123

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2026

24 mars 2026

to decide where it would be in her best interests to live.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1130JUD002534719

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2023

30 novembre 2023

the decision to grant the applicant in application no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1014JUD000979119

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2025

14 octobre 2025

In their submissions, the applicants claim that the indictment was returned to the military prosecutor’s office owing to irregularities and that their complaints continue to be investigated. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1003DEC006354319

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2023

3 octobre 2023

It was also important for the child’s best interests to keep the continuity of care and to give him a chance to a continuous development ( kontinuierliche Entwicklung ).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202313

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2020

4 mars 2020

On 10 November 2016 the Chief of Military police of the Ministry of Defence applied to the Malatia-Sebastia District Court of Yerevan seeking authorisation to carry out a covert operation in respect of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0205JUD004011015

Admin. suprême

5 février 2026

5 février 2026

It was concluded after a forensic examination that the semen found in A.’s body could have belonged to V.I. or to V.I. and I.C., but not exclusively to I.C.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0113JUD000700521

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2026

13 janvier 2026

to join them to the main criminal investigation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0826JUD000352422

Admin. suprême

26 août 2025

26 août 2025

be served to them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1121DEC004462819

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2023

21 novembre 2023

Istrătescu, lawyers practising in Bucharest; the decision to give notice of the application to the Romanian Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Ms O.F.

Source officielle