Pinheiro Farinha, suppléants, ont remplacé MM. Carrillo Salcedo et Valticos, empêchés; à son tour, le second nommé a été remplacé par M. I. Foighel (articles 22 § 1 et 24 § 1 du règlement). 4.

Pinheiro Farinha ,     L.-E. Pettiti ,     B. Walsh ,   Sir   Vincent Evans ,   MM.   C. Russo ,     R. Bernhardt ,     J.

However the Court can change this classification under its supervisory role (see Kharmalov v Russia, no. 27447/07, § 31, 8   October   2015; Pinto Pinheiro Marques v.

Court has focused on assessing the proportionality of an interference when examining complaints under Article   10 stemming from defamation proceedings brought by a municipal council (see Pinto Pinheiro

Pinheiro Farinha ,     L.-E. Pettiti ,     B. Walsh ,     R. Macdonald ,     C. Russo ,     R. Bernhardt ,     A.

Pinheiro Farinha ,   Mr   L.-E. Pettiti ,   Mr   B. Walsh ,   Sir   Vincent Evans ,   Mr   R. Macdonald ,   Mr   C. Russo ,   Mr   R.

Pinheiro Farinha, Mr, R. Bernhardt, Mr J. De Meyer, Mr S.K. Martens and Mr J.M. Morenilla (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 para. 4) (art. 43). 4.

  France (déc.), n o 72531/01, CEDH, 9 décembre 2003, Carballo et Pinero c. Portugal (déc.), n o 31237/09, 21 juin 2011, et Diriöz c. Turquie , n o   38560/04, §§ 25-26, 31 mai 2012). 57.

Pinheiro Farinha ,   Mr.   L.-E. Pettiti ,   Mr.   B. Walsh ,   Mr.   R. Macdonald ,   Mr.   C. Russo ,   Mr.   R. Bernhardt ,   Mr.   J.

opinion, approved by Mr Macdonald, annexed to the Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, p. 80, together with the joint separate opinion of Mr Lagergren, Mr Pinheiro

Piñeiro Nogueira c. Espagne (déc.), n o   8035/05, 22 mai 2006, et, mutatis mutandis , Loewenguth c.   France (déc.), n o   53183/99, CEDH 2000-VI, et Krombach c.

France (déc.), n o 72531/01, 9 décembre 2003, Carballo et Pinero c. Portugal (déc.), n o 31237/09, 21 juin 2011, et Diriöz c.   Turquie (n o   38560/04, § 25, 31 mai 2012). 52.

  _______________ (21) See, among others: the joint separate opinion of Judges Lagergren, Pinheiro Farinha, Pettiti, Macdonald, De Meyer and Valticos in the case of W. v. the United Kingdom, Series

Pinheiro Farinha ,   Mr.   E. García de Enterria ,   Mr.   L.-E. Pettiti ,   Mr.   B. Walsh ,   Sir   Vincent Evans ,   Mr.   R.

interest for the University staff while the domestic courts considered the applicant’s subjective appraisal of the election procedure to be a factual accusation (see, for similar reasoning, Pinto Pinheiro

I must say first that, in agreement with Judges Ganshof van der Meersch, Bindschedler-Robert, Liesch, Gölcüklü, Matscher, Pinheiro Farinha and Pettiti in their concurring opinion in the case of Young,

While the existence of facts can be demonstrated, the truth of value judgments is not susceptible of proof (see Pinto Pinheiro Marques v.   Portugal , no.

Pinheiro Farinha ,   Mr.   L.-E. Pettiti ,   Mr.   B. Walsh ,   Sir   Vincent Evans ,   Mr.   R. Macdonald ,   Mr.   C. Russo ,   Mr.   R.

Pinheiro Farinha ,   Mr   L.-E. Pettiti ,   Mr   B. Walsh ,   Sir   Vincent Evans ,   Mr   R. Macdonald ,   Mr   C. Russo ,   Mr   R.