72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

The Court has previously found that this arrangement may undermine the adversarial nature of the proceedings and compromise judicial impartiality (see, among other authorities, Karelin v.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; and Karelin v. Russia , no.

    Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well ‑ established case-law (see Karelin v.

  72051/17, §§   34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia , no.

Russia , no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

Russia, nos. 7077/06 and 12 others, §§ 76-79, 26 June 2018, Karelin v. Russia , no.   926/08, 20 September 2016, Misan v.

  72051/17, §§   34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, concerning various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, and Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, §§   58-85, 20 September 2016. REMAINING COMPLAINTS 12.

Switzerland , no. 25088/07, §   43, 6   December 2012; Karelin v. Russia , no. 926/08, 20 September 2016; and Gorlov and Others v. Russia , nos.

  72051/17, §§   34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.   Russia , no.

Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Karelin v.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.

Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well ‑ established case-law (see Karelin v.

  25501/07 and 4 others, §§ 106-225, 26   April 2016, relating to disproportionate measures taken by the authorities against participants of solo manifestations; Karelin v.

    In the leading case of Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

  72051/17, §§   34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v.