Croatia , no. 49439/21, §§ 23-41, 5 September 2023). 14/02/2025 18/10/2024 13,200 1,080     29637/21 02/06/2021 Dino KOVAČ 1979   Art. 6 (1) - denial of access to higher courts – complaint

Vu le jugement réputé contradictoire du 6 janvier 2011 du tribunal de commerce de Roubaix Tourcoing ayant dit recevable et bien fondée l'exception de litispendance, s'étant dessaisi au profit de la High

    On 9 January 2003 the Higher Commercial Court (as the Higher Arbitration Court was renamed) quashed the decision of 15 October 2002 and remitted the case to the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Commercial

When metering out the sentence the High Court stated:   “The High Court ... has taken into account that [the case] concerns aggravated and systematic offences against property involving very substantial

as the ultimate Court of Appeal, and as I have indicated, the very fact that the remedies which the plaintiff was seeking in the High Court included an Order by the High Court reviewing and setting aside

It noted that proceedings between Mr Ahern and the Tribunal were pending in the High Court.

    In a judgment of 26   March 2016, which was upheld by the High Court of Cassation and Justice (“the High Court”) in a final judgment of 2   June 2016, the Constanţa Court of Appeal

and that a unanimous High Court agreed with the parties on this point.

This ruling was upheld by the High Court of Cassation and Justice in March 2003 (“the outstanding judgment”).

    The applicant’s appeal was heard by the Eger High Court. On 25   August 2016 the applicant requested that all judges of the High Court be excluded from the case. 5.

        In April 1983 the applicant instituted proceedings in the High Court of Eastern Denmark (Østre Landsret) against his previous legal counsel in order to obtain damages

By a decision of 6 December 2011 the High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the applicant company’s appeal.

On appeal, this decision was upheld by the High Court of Western Denmark ( Vestre Landsret ) on 1   October   1992.

pending the High Court’s review of the Circuit Court’s decision.

       The judgment was appealed against to the High Court of Eastern Denmark (Østre Landsret).

Nor did he raise any questions as to the impartiality of the Bailiff's Court or the High Court.

Y..., et la société High Pro étaient devenues partenaires et avaient obtenu pour la première fois des marchés publics avec l'AP-HP aussitôt après la démission de M.

    Does the refusal of the High Court of Cassation and Justice to reopen the domestic proceedings in the light of the Court’s judgment in S.C. Aectra Agrochemicals S.A. and Munteanu v.

This decision was upheld by the High Court of Eastern Denmark (Østre Landsret) on 15 May 1996.     On 10 December 1996 the City Court found in favour of the defendants.