Răduleţu,   Mateja Đurović , judges , and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 30 May 2017, Having deliberated, decides as follows

to the one of the applicant, allowing him to have the violation of the Convention acknowledged, either explicitly or in substance, and to receive adequate and sufficient compensation at the domestic level

    However, the applicants either ceased to be held in conditions that were allegedly contrary to the Convention before 13   January   2021 or continue to be held in such conditions

contrary to the Convention before 13   January   2021 or continue to be held in such conditions.

The court noted that the vehicle in question had never been declared to the relevant authorities for the applicable import duties to be levied (see paragraph 6 below).

Recalling that issues such as the weight attached by the national courts to given items of evidence or to findings or assessments before them for consideration are not for the Court to review (see Bochan

was to be confiscated.

in tort was an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have the violation of the Convention acknowledged, either explicitly or in substance, and to receive

Briceac, lawyer practising in Chișinău at the time; the decision to give notice of the application to the Moldovan Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Mr   D.

    In relation to the Trade Union (see paragraph 9 above), the court rejected all claims made by the applicant, as she was unable to demonstrate that the alleged facts could be attributed to

The Court sees no reason to call those findings into question; to hold otherwise would effectively require the domestic authorities to tolerate unlawful constructions each time their ownership is transferred

Its role is limited to providing an opinion in relation to the questions submitted to it.

In his statement to the police, P.A.S. admitted to having facilitated contacts between the criminal organization and those obliged to pay the “revolutionary tax”.

specific conditions needed for it to be considered valid.

guarantees owed to the parties. 10 .

Dzamashvili, of the Ministry of Justice, and to declare inadmissible the remainder of the application; the parties’ observations; the decision to reject the Government’s objection to the examination of

They offered to pay the applicants the amounts detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1 &#

THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

THE LAW Joinder of the applications Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.