CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0604JUD003747197
4 juin 2002
Within that Section, the Chamber that would consider the case (Article 27 § 1 of the Convention) was constituted as provided in Rule 26 § 1 of the Rules of Court.
Page 30 sur 2215
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0205DEC001638011
5 février 2013
Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, in so far as relevant, reads: “1.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1129DEC002386094
29 novembre 1995
Rule 43 of the Commission's Rules of Procedure requires any application under Articles 24 or 25 (Art. 24, 25) of the Convention to be submitted "in writing".
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1027JUD001669690
27 octobre 1995
Commission on the organisation of the proceedings (Rules 39 para. 1 and 40).
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0517REP001239586
17 mai 1990
Rule 34 (2).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC000075313
17 septembre 2013
39 of the Rules of Court).
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49324
20 février 1992
5 of the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers for the application of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention, to pay to the applicant for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage the sum of 125 million
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-56854
10 avril 2000
3 (1), rule 7 (1), (3) et (4), et rule 8 (1) du County Court Rules 1981 ) n’était plus applicable.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0904DEC006241017
4 septembre 2025
on Refugees and Exiles, Having regard to the interim measure indicated to the respondent Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The
ECLI:CEDH:001-49326
5 of the Rules adopted by the Committee of Ministers for the application of Article 32 (art. 32) of the Convention, to pay to the applicant by way of just satisfaction the sum of 12 million Italian lire
ECLI:CEDH:001-49327
pension; Recalling that, after examination of the Commission's proposals as to just satisfaction for the applicant, it had recommended to the Government of Italy, under Rule
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0626DEC006012417
26 juin 2018
On 22 August 2017 the Court indicated to the Russian Government an interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court preventing the applicant’s removal to Uzbekistan.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210432
18 mai 2021
On 12 June 2020 the applicant’s request of an interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court was granted.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1129DEC000660705
29 novembre 2005
, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1114DEC006155916
14 novembre 2017
On 8 November 2016 the duty judge decided, under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, to indicate to the Government that it was desirable in the interest of the parties and the proper conduct of the proceedings
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0504DEC005233419
4 mai 2023
On 17 October 2019 the Court decided to indicate to the Government of the Netherlands, under Rule 39 of the Rules of the Court, that the applicants should not be expelled to Greece and to give notice to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0912DEC001098416
12 septembre 2017
She therefore requested that her application be struck out of the Court’s list of cases and that the interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court be discontinued.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529JUD000450306
29 mai 2012
sit as ad hoc judge (Article 26 § 4 of the Convention and Rule 29 § 1 of the Rules of Court).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0823DEC003719910
23 août 2011
39 of the Rules of Court and the fact that this interim measure has been complied with, Having regard to the decision to grant priority to the above applications under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0504DEC003100720
On 28 July 2020 the Court decided to indicate to the Government of the Netherlands, under Rule 39 of the Rules of the Court, that the applicants should not be expelled to Greece.